Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Kek@Kun having more technical mastery or a style advantage against Maul. If anything, it'd be Kun being more powerful.
Ancient Sith combat techniques combined with a unique Trakata/dual-phase variant of Niman saberstaff combat. Yeh, that with precog is an advantage.
Clearly not given the likes of Tulak Hord slaughtered armies with his skills. Traya states the ancient Sith make Kotor era swordsman look like children and Chris Avellone stated her assessment was accurate. With the Dark Holocron Exar Kun learnt designs for his weapon and Sith teachings he personally attributes his easy victory over Vodo to, as opposed to Kun usually being a peer of Vodo.
Originally posted by AncientPower
Clearly not given the likes of Tulak Hord slaughtered armies with his skills.
Armies from the same era, that would be scaled accordingly, lmao, that's pointlessly circular.
Tulak Hord was super-awesome because he could use a lightsaber at all, people like Ragnos were still using swords.
Traya states the ancient Sith make Kotor era swordsman look like children and Chris Avellone stated her assessment was accurate.
Traya is significantly below any of the PT powerhouses as a duelist. She's also nitpicking like a small handful of ancient sith out of several thousand years.
With the Dark Holocron Exar Kun learnt designs for his weapon and Sith teachings he personally attributes his easy victory over Vodo to, as opposed to Kun usually being a peer of Vodo.
Yes, but Maul comes with the training methods of one thousand years of iterative improvements from Bane to Sidious, and has potential to rival Palpatine's.
Originally posted by AncientPower
Making TOTJ/KOTOR era duelists look like children is absolutely a valid observation, it's a style Maul is not familiar with. If you don't agree then you're more than welcome to your opinion.