Narration calls Sids the most powerful, even if it's third person limited. KMC sucks it up like a prostitute on a slow weekend.
Narration calls Ragnos the strongest of the strongest in an era of talented Sith Force users, via third person ominiscient. KMC claims featless, begins petty campaign to stomp feet electronically.
Shit, is this 2006 or 2016? Aside from name changes and avatars, I can't tell the difference.
Originally posted by carthage
What if Ragnos had his scepter?
What if he had the Delorean?
He's not walking into the fight naked. It's most likely standard gear, considering he kept his fighting sword in it.
Could he take Abeloth? I don't know. From what little I remember of her, not on a good day. She was prodigiously powerful in the Force.
Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
The "TOR Brigade" shitting on KOTOR 2 = the era shitting on itself. Do you have any idea how conservative we are in ranking TOR characters relative to the feats of the protagonists in vanilla TOR?
I know exactly what the bunch of you have been doing for years, and Kotor is hardly your only victim.
Originally posted by AncientPower
Hence 'see', her actual combative appearances are laughably below her supposedly god-like levels of prowess.
1. When she's in her own original body and not an avatar body and subdues the Son and Daughter (since her avatar bodies are indeed limiting)
2. When she's reached the point in the progression of her escape where she's assimilated planets and is wiping out civilizations.
She's noted to be weakened by imprisonment iirc and the longer she's out of her confinement the more powerful she becomes, and in FOTJ she was apparently approaching the point where the mortals of the Galaxy would have no hope of stopping her. Her escape in FOTJ hardly progressed to nearly the same extent as her other escapes.