Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Kind of a mismatch. Sadow takes Force by so much and Maul takes Sabers by so much. In a duel Maul would win.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Avellone personally backed up Kreia's comments in emails between him and ChaosTheory123, so it's been gaining support.All it means is the ancient Sith's vast superiority to Kreia, the Exile, and other KotOR II friends, which is hardly that unbelievable.
Mm I still hate the lack of feats most have. Like how Tulak Hord was said to be the greatest duelist ever or something because everyone who dueled him died. It's just annoying, more info needs to be given.
People like Sadow though have genuine feats
Sadow breaking Maul's mind is a bit difficult to believe, but I agree that he takes the Force round each and every time with utmost certainty. All-out can still feasibly go either way, since I'm backing Maul for sabers. I could see Sadow winning a majority for all-out if he makes reasonable use of his talents in Sorcery.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
What? There's rarely a mass distinction between the two. The ultimate driving factor in a lightsaber duel is power. The power that translates to augmentation which dictates speed, strength, precognotion, etc. If Sadow is vastly more powerful than Maul, which he is and you even agree on such, he's clearly winning a confrontation between the two. Even ignoring the spells and sorcery Sadow knows that should be capable of breaking Maul's mind, it's stated he would be capable of besting an entire army of Massassi warriors (which bested all the other Massassi warrior armies on Yavin IV), which is honestly beyond Maul's capabilities. Add on the quotes from Kreia regarding the ancient Sith Lords, his duel with Ludo Kressh, his status as the embodiment of a Sith Marauder in Vitiate's Sith Empire, and being a master strategist, and Maul will definitely lose.
Citations needed plz. Scans and sources would be preferable.