Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Maul fought Grievous who is effectively multiple opponents (which is why Fisto did so damn well) and didn't get his ass kicked. Grievous in SOD isn't trash
Are you mentally deficient? Firsty, Grevious isn't essentially multiple opponents, he is one opponent who tends to wield multiple sabers. I hope you can tell the difference. Secondly, Grevious never engaged Maul on all fours and their fights were never long enough to be conclusive. Maul rugby tackling the cyborg in the first fight, and Force pushing him in last.
Originally posted by chingchangwalla
[B]Lel I know the difference dickwad but in every thread I've seen involving Fisto, someone brings up the duel against
Ohhh so because other people said so... well fuck, that must make it true. I forgot that the damming evidence for an idea, that if many people believe it, the idea becomes completely infallible. Much like in the 1800's, where there was a widespread belief that bloodletting cured sickness. Yet, all of these people were not just wrong, but horribly wrong, because in fact it made people sicker. Clearly, the popularity of an idea is no guarantee that it's right.
Grievous and points are made that Fisto just treated the situation like it was a 1v4. You can even tell that in the scene
You can't tell jack-shit. This is the same Grevious that lost out to Jar Jar & freinds, and not the four-armed monstrosity that regularly chews through council masters like a lawn-mower. That's the reason he looses to Fisto.
Originally posted by Ziggystardust
Ohhh so because other people said so... well fuck, that must make it true. I forgot that the damming evidence for an idea, that if many people believe it, the idea becomes completely infallible. Much like in the 1800's, where there was a widespread belief that bloodletting cured sickness. Yet, all of these people were not just wrong, but horribly wrong, because in fact it made people sicker. Clearly, the popularity of an idea is no guarantee that it's right.You can't tell jack-shit. This is the same Grevious that lost out to Jar Jar & freinds, And not the four-armed monstrosity that regularly chews through council masters like a lawn -mower. That's the reason he looses to Fisto.
Hahah insult game strong. Nah I'll hand it you, you're right. Grievous might not be the council master killing machine that he was pre TCW but he still chews through Jedi knights with no effort at all. And if Shii-Cho isn't giving Fisto an advantage then hats off to him, he seems to lose a lot of battles on these threads because his lightsaber form is shit in a 1v1 situation. So he has overcome this now or what?