Originally posted by JmanghanActually, the gameplay isn't that fun. Gameplay is very bland and the progression is a joke. The complete lack of single player offline modes is a tragedy and the fact they think they're going to sell a sequel to this shit is insulting to the intelligence. Anyone who buys the sequel to this deserves to be flogged. I'm ashamed I bought the first one; but I'll not make the same mistake twice.
The gameplay is fun.Thats all I care about.
But, it shouldn't have been $60.
Fun is subjective term. You might not find it fun but Jmanghan does. No way you can argue either way.
Your other points are valid though but I guarantee if DICE puts out a trailer similar to Battlefield 1 and it shows a SP campaign, people will probably will buy even though they could of said something very similar.
Originally posted by Ridley_PrimeI.E. a ripoff. I've NEVER been as disappointed in a game as I was with Battlefront, especially after its predecessors. The original Battlefront 1 and 2 are LEAGUES better and it's not even close.
Regardless of price, the problem was it looked like an unpresentable, skeletal husk of a game without the all DLC, season passes, etc.
I don't understand the surprise and shock about this. I mean, when you bought Battlefront 3 you basically told EA with your wallet: "EA Games, please **** me in my ass. EA games, I want to pay for content that's a quarter in size of what I got in the previous installment 10 years, ago for nearly double the price!"
Annual/bi-annual assrapings is just EA giving you what you all asked for.
But I wonder how many people who bought Battlefront 3 were hardcore gamers. I always thought it was casual people who bought them all.
I love Battlefield and the one coming out this year is one of the most anticipated games I want to play this year and I didn't even buy Battlefront 3. Hell, I even loved Battlefield 4 which a lot of people didn't like.