Originally posted by Beniboybling
Gosh this is painful, you asked for a scientific explanation and I gave you one, in which it was explained to be a matter of probability.Sometimes the odds align in your favour and you get "lucky".
This was again, not the case for Kenobi. Now I'm going to quote the scene for you, try to pay attention.
There is again, no room to argue that he escaped significant trauma, at no point does "luck" save him from hitting the floor or slamming into the wall. Nor is his unscathed survival attributed to chance or a miracle, but his endurance capabilities. Your point is therefore moot.
And that's my last post on the matter, I'm only willing to humour your stupidity for so long.
So all humans have same level of endurance irrespective of their physiology?
Physiology, survival skills and other factors make no difference in life-threatening situations?
Let us consider an analogy:
Person A is bulky and strong and Person B is thin and weak. Both are struck by a hammer in the head at the same spot. Would both tolerate the blow on equal footing and/or suffer exactly same injuries and/or die at the same time?
Your mocking is cheap, my friend.
Obi-Wan Kenobi, Ven Zallow and Aryn Leener may or may not be in the same TIER in the aspect of endurance and/or Force-based defenses. One thing is clear that they could use the Force to mitigate the effects of a blunt-force trauma. And they did.
Now take a good look at the argument of SunRazer:
"That's because she ended up cartwheeling into a rock. Compare that to Obi-Wan being accelerated into the Invisible Hand's wall with such force that the hydrofoam permacrete fell onto him, and even then he emerged unscathed except for a bump on his head. As you can imagine, Obi-Wan's Force-augmented durability is vastly beyond Aryn Leneer's, and Anakin came close to breaking his arms when considerably hindered. Now imagine Anakin at full strength. Beyond Malgus's strength? I think so."
This argument is weak. My response is right above.