General Grievous vs Darth Maul

Started by chingchangwalla2 pages

General Grievous vs Darth Maul

Round 1: Sabers only
Round 2: Force only (Useless but anyway)
Round 3: All out

- Grievous as of Hypori
- Maul as of Rebels or late TCW, depends on which you think is better

Hmm...
Either way
Maul, lmao
Either way

Maul takes all handily.

Grievous written as he was initially envisioned should rival Maul in sabers, though obviously loses once the Force becomes a factor.

That said, this is pre-prime Grievous, so he loses sabers in a spectacular duel.

I think Rebels Maul > TCW Maul, who is already a rival of Kenobi as a swordsman.

Nothing suggests that he grew as a swordsman.

Maul wins.

1. Maul
2. Maul
3. Maul
Yeah, GG is out of his pay grade, here.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Maul takes all handily.
Originally posted by SunRazer
Nothing suggests that he grew as a swordsman.

If he grew more powerful, he likely grew as a swordsman unless if there's reason to think he declined in other areas. He may have degraded physically, but that's of significantly less importance.

Maul, at least, isn't taking this handily.

Why not? This is Grievous pre-Fisto defeat.

It's also Legends Grievous, not that pile of shit TCW.

As for the thread, Maul in all with difficulty.

As for Maul becoming a better swordsman in Rebels, he probably did. According to Kanan, Maul > Ahsoka, and we have his duel against the three Inqs and his duel against Ahsoka as references.

Neither of those things put him above TCW Maul.

TCW Maul wins against canon grievous
Rebels Maul armed with a staff is at a disadvantage against a 4 saber-wielding opponent.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Neither of those things put him above TCW Maul.

Well, Rebels Ahsoka > TCW Maul, so. 🙂

Based on what?

Facts. Evidence. Logic. 🙂

Speaking of.... http://i35.servimg.com/u/f35/18/86/74/45/image10.png

Go figure. 🙂