Ok Time-Immemorial, here is an example. He made a mention of not honoring NATO if they don't pay America. Basically that would make the U.S. one giant mercenary military power. If he doesn't honor the treaty, Russia benefits and Putin can overrun Europe Call of Duty style.
He looks at the world from a business perspective which is fine. But when war breaks out, business matters are useless. Do you think ISIS cares about their bank account? They are more interesting in mass murder of Muslims, Christians, Jews and other faiths.
I really REALLY respect his concern for veterans, but a view like that scares me. But regardless, he'd make a better leader than Hillary. At least he doesn't have national secrets on his home computer.
You do realize until today he has never had access to classified briefings. And your going to base your entire opinion off what he has "said" before.
He now will have detailed classified briefings, on the same level as Obama, so now he will be informed on the same level as Obama and Clinton and can use his intelligence to decide what to do.
Obama has never listened to any of his military advisors.
Last part was a small joke, but when a person openly states a view like that tends to frighten people. Hillary had a field day when he said he'd reactivate water boarding (I agree with that view and would go further with 24 style interrogations). Many in the public do not hold that stance.
When he stated that he keep the option of using nuclear weapons in Europe scares people. The only time I'd use a WMD if it was confirmed that a state like Iran provided terrorists with components.
Originally posted by Darth Truculent
he said he'd reactivate water boarding
wut
Originally posted by Darth Truculent
When he stated that he keep the option of using nuclear weapons in Europe
wut
Originally posted by Darth Truculent
The only time I'd use a WMD if it was confirmed that a state like Iran provided terrorists with components.
wut
The problem with nukes is the people who truly deserve it don't get nuked. Look at the nukes we dropped on Japan. I don't necessarily think the civilians deserved that, it was their leaders that made awful decisions.
It would be rare for all terrorists to gather in a remote area so we could just nuke them all without any innocents getting harmed.
Originally posted by Time-ImmemorialHuh. So once you become the nominee you get more knowledge on such matters? Genuine question as I don't know American election system that well.
He now will have detailed classified briefings, on the same level as Obama, so now he will be informed on the same level as Obama and Clinton and can use his intelligence to decide what to do.
If so, Clinton is really fvcked in these elections.
Yes you get everything.
Paul Ryan tried to block her access. Guess what, Obama administration denied it.
Originally posted by Surtur
The problem with nukes is the people who truly deserve it don't get nuked. Look at the nukes we dropped on Japan. I don't necessarily think the civilians deserved that, it was their leaders that made awful decisions.It would be rare for all terrorists to gather in a remote area so we could just nuke them all without any innocents getting harmed.
Well, not with nukes anyway and even with today's technology precise strikes are not always 100% on point.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Yes you get everything.Paul Ryan tried to block her access. Guess what, Obama administration denied it.
Trump is not held back by PC nor Leftist ideology like she is, and his common sense attitude is more in line with reality of today's world anyway.
Originally posted by Stigma
Then Clinton is indeed fvcked.Trump is not held back by PC nor Leftist ideology like she is, and his common sense attitude is more in line with reality of today's world anyway.
What is ever more dangerous is that Comey told congress that there is nothing to stop Hilary from doing what she did again..