Masters that were Significantly younger then their Padawans

Started by Jmanghan2 pages
Jmanghan Senior Member

Masters that were Significantly younger then their Padawans

Sidious and Dooku come to mind, as Dooku was older then Dooku IIRC.

Emperordmb LSDMB

Was Tol Braga younger than that Dark Council ****?

Syndicate Senior Member

Aayla and Vos?

Jmanghan Senior Member

Dooku was older then Sidious*

DarthAnt66 DarthAnt66

Palpatine and Dooku is probably the classic and main example. I can't think of many others.

ILS Restricted

Originally posted by Syndicate
Aayla and Vos?
Vos found her as a child when he was already a Padawan.

cs_zoltan Senior Member

Re: Masters that were Significantly younger then their Padawans

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Dooku was older then Dooku IIRC.

I doubt it.

Jmanghan Senior Member

Re: Re: Masters that were Significantly younger then their Padawans

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
I doubt it.
Hey listen buddy, we all have opinions.

FreshestSlice Eternal Commander

Yours worse than most.

Jmanghan Senior Member
Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Yours worse than most.

Says the guy who is "Feats Only" and uses assumptions during debates.

"Duh, Revan only known for force power, so thats what he uses, he no beat Malak saber duel, Duh"

Nice comeback you made in that thread btw, top notch stuff there.

cs_zoltan Senior Member

Re: Re: Re: Masters that were Significantly younger then their Padawans

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Hey listen buddy, we all have opinions.

Sure we do. But thinking Dooku is older than Dooku might be the most retarded opinion of all.

Jmanghan Senior Member

Re: Re: Re: Re: Masters that were Significantly younger then their Padawans

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Sure we do. But thinking Dooku is older than Dooku might be the most retarded opinion of all.
Do you frequent 4chan?

cs_zoltan Senior Member

No.

Beniboybling Worst Member

Jman is filled with such rage. 🙂

FreshestSlice Eternal Commander

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Says the guy who is "Feats Only" and uses assumptions during debates.

Literally everyone?

"Duh, Revan only known for force power, so thats what he uses, he no beat Malak saber duel, Duh"

Nice comeback you made in that thread btw, top notch stuff there.


Given the above, I doubt you can actually read anyway, but I guess it's the thought that counts.

Jmanghan Senior Member

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Literally everyone?

Given the above, I doubt you can actually read anyway, but I guess it's the thought that counts.

By everyone, do you mean, just you?

Because you are the only one who has argued Feats-Only.

Even Tempest/Gideon said its stupid.

There's hype and feats, and to be a debater, you need to accept both, or just debate on characters who have feats.

And yes, that was me coming at you about the Ancient Sith.

You make baseless assumptions on shit that didn't happen.

Go back to the thread and counter my argument.

Oh wait, you can't, because your argument is based on some bs that never happened.

Syndicate Senior Member

I argue feats only.

ILS Restricted

Apart from when taking a feat at face value displeases you.

Syndicate Senior Member

I take all feats as they are.

cs_zoltan Senior Member

How about that feat where Vader ragdolls Starkiller? mmm