Originally posted by Beniboybling
Must it be spelt out for you? He's referring to his ability to manifest as a Force ghost, not his combative strength. 😬
Actually, the novel back in 1977, wasn't it? Using it against an argument for a character that really only becomes developed 28 years later is pretty laughable - even for you.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66Because it was Kenobi who taught him to be Darth Vader? No lol, he's referring to Anakin as a Jedi.
And Kenobi is clearly referring to Darth Vader's command of the Force, and not the fact Skywalker was an emotional wreck previously but now in control of his power. 🙄Actually, the novel back in 1977, wasn't it? Using it against an argument for a character that really only becomes developed 28 years later is pretty laughable - even for you.
And I didn't realise these sources had an expiry date, I guess the Original Trilogy is no longer relevant either then? Noted.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66😂
I was being sarcastic.
A quote from 1977 isn't relevant in regards to a character fleshed out in 2005.Repeating yourself doesn't make what you're saying any less retarded. SW continuity doesn't work by writing over what's come before, but by aligning with and expanding on it. And the novelisations have been described by Lucasfilm as pretty centric in that regard:
'Gospel,' or canon as we refer to it, includes the screenplays, the films, the radio dramas and the novelizations."
"When it comes to absolute canon, the real story of Star Wars, you must turn to the films themselves - and only the films. Even novelizations are interpretations of the film, and while they are largely true to George Lucas' vision (he works quite closely with the novel authors), the method in which they are written does allow for some minor differences. The novelizations are written concurrently with the film's production, so variations in detail do creep in from time to time. Nonetheless, they should be regarded as very accurate depictions of the fictional Star Wars movies."So no, you're basically bullshitting. The OT is actually relevant to Vader's story arc lmao.
Originally posted by NewGuy01
And nobody thinks ANH Kenobi would have a chance in hell in a duel against his younger self, oddly enough.
That actually is odd given ANH Kenobi is barely a couple of years older than ROTS Mace, and decades younger than AOTC/TCW/ROTS Dooku.
The Only logical reason for that to be the case the would be that Old Ben was just out of practice.