Revenge of the Sith improvements?

Started by DarthAnt663 pages

Revenge of the Sith improvements?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-hFh35U3go

I think the film would have been better if they cut out some of the Utapu story and instead put in the scenes above.

In particular, the scenes with Palpatine and Skywalker should have been in it.

Maybe if Hayden Christensen wasn't acting

Hayden did fine in ROTS IMO. A massive improvement from his performance in AOTC.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Hayden did fine in ROTS IMO. A massive improvement from his performance in AOTC.
Not according to the guys at Honest Trailers.

The prequels were a mess and a bane on the franchise.

Originally posted by Ziggystardust
The prequels were a mess and a bane on the franchise.

Saber fights were better though.

Unless you aren't into fast-paced over-the-top combat, which is what I live for, personally.

Those scenes are pretty shit lol, I'm glad they never made it into the movie. As for that second to last one, tell me that's fan made.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Not according to the guys at Honest Trailers.

Who cares

Originally posted by Ziggystardust
The prequels were a mess and a bane on the franchise.

Nah they were Awesome

Originally posted by Ziggystardust
The prequels were a mess and a bane on the franchise.
Rots is still the best Star Wars film to date.

😂

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
😂
Please don't tell me you're one of those ESB sheep.

I liked ROTJ the most out of the Trilogy, because thats when Luke really started to become a bad-ass.

Oh, and Stupendous Wave has strike 1, claiming Vader was holding back against Luke in ROTJ, and that Vader would have stomped him otherwise.

One film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for it's cultural impact, and aesthetical adroitness; while the other is accused of raping childhoods, and spawned a plethora of internet memes.

Use whatever is left of that cranium of yours, and do the math. 👆

While ESB is the better film, ROTS is definitely the more entertaining film to watch.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
One film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for it's cultural impact, and aesthetical adroitness; while the other is accused of raping childhoods, and spawned a plethora of internet memes.

Use whatever is left of that cranium of yours, and do the math. 👆

😂

RotS is actually my second fave Star Wars film in terms of entertainment value...but to say it's better than ESB?

Pure blasphemy.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
One film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress for it's cultural impact, and aesthetical adroitness; while the other is accused of raping childhoods, and spawned a plethora of internet memes.

Use whatever is left of that cranium of yours, and do the math. 👆

So your opinion is based off the recognition and opinion of others. I don't give a **** about what the guy next to me thinks I base my opinion on my own preferences and taste. I didn't say Rots won more awards or is more recognized either.

Rots in terms of rewatchability factor shits all over ESB.

No, not at all.

But by your logic, and judging from a purely subjective standpoint, I can say Fast 5, is better than Godfather II because I like it better, and it has more "rewatch" value. Objectively speaking, the greater film is obviously the latter.

RotS is a tight popcorn flick; ESB is a beautifully written cinematic masterpiece.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
I liked ROTJ the most out of the Trilogy, because thats when Luke really started to become a bad-ass.

Oh, and Stupendous Wave has strike 1, claiming Vader was holding back against Luke in ROTJ, and that Vader would have stomped him otherwise.

He was holding back although it wouldn't have been a stomp.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
RotS is actually my second fave Star Wars film in terms of entertainment value...but to say it's better than ESB?

Pure blasphemy.

Blasphemy against who exactly?

I'm sure the creator of both those films (Mr. Lucas) wouldn't mind those comments.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo

But by your logic, and judging from a purely subjective standpoint, I can say Fast 5, is better than Godfather II because I like it better, and it has more "rewatch" value. Objectively speaking, the greater film is obviously the latter.

Well not really tbh.

I'm betting there's a lot more people claiming ROTS is the best SW film than there are people claiming the Furious franchise is superior to the Godfather franchise.