Originally posted by Deronn_soloBecause he deflected
Galen fans don't use common sense, tho.Starkiller II couldn't win against a Vader that was a "shell of him former self" all around, yet they believe he can best a "far more formidable" version of the character, that reached the pinnacle of his power by RotJ. 😂
Hell, I think Palpatine was losing, the game makes a better case then the novel does.
But then you guys who debate for Vader make no sense either, when you argue Vader "ragdolling" Starkiller out a window, in which he lands on his feet means something.
Lets not pretend Starkiller didn't do similar shit, remember when Starkiller pushed Vader into the electrical tower thing for like 10 seconds?
I do.
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Galen fans don't use common sense, tho.Starkiller II couldn't win against a Vader that was a "shell of him former self" all around, yet they believe he can best a "far more formidable" version of the character, that reached the pinnacle of his power by RotJ. 😂
Canon Vader reached his peak in Rebels per Filoni.
Starkiller would lose to Legends Vader but as canon Vader is now he hasn't shown the feats nessecary to defeat him.
'The New Essential Chronology'. I'll quote the relevant passage tomorrow, if I remember that is.
Of course that only pertains to Legends Vader, but the "giving up his rage" argument, and his Force reserves being taxed after getting utterly crushed by rage amped Luke, and losing a hand in the process, still stands. 👆
Originally posted by Deronn_soloTbh, he just tanked the lightning, as opposed to holding it off though, so you can't really use that as an argument against Marek.
'The New Essential Chronology'. I'll quote the relevant passage tomorrow, if I remember that is.Of course that only pertains to Legends Vader, but the "giving up his rage" argument, and his Force reserves being taxed after getting utterly crushed by rage amped Luke, and losing a hand in the process, still stands. 👆