What the U.S. could learn from the Polish education system

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Centralizing schools is the complete oposite of what should be done. F*** public schools in general and f*** 'Comon Core'. 👆

If that offends Kirk or any other moron well then that's just too damn bad. Kirk's opinion on these issues like this is why I laugh to myself when he tries to pretend he's a conservative or even just part of the real right in general though he may very well be part of the racist alt-right.

One more time just for you Kirk, so you get the message loud and clear: F*** Common Core, f*** big government, f*** centralizing schools, f*** forced vaccinations, f*** abortions, f*** gun resistration/control, and f*** your idol Niezche (or however you spell that p-o-s german's name).

You're not a real right-winger so quit f***ing pretending like you are.

I bet Kirk supports disgusting Eugenics shit as well. Racist Margaret Sanger would be so proud. 👆

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Centralizing schools is the complete oposite of what should be done. F*** public schools in general and f*** 'Comon Core'. 👆

If that offends Kirk or any other moron well then that's just too damn bad. Kirk's opinion on these issues like this is why I laugh to myself when he tries to pretend he's a conservative or even just part of the real right in general though he may very well be part of the racist alt-right.

One more time just for you Kirk, so you get the message loud and clear: F*** Common Core, f*** big government, f*** centralizing schools, f*** forced vaccinations, f*** abortions, f*** gun resistration/control, and f*** your idol Niezche (or however you spell that p-o-s german's name).

You're not a real right-winger so quit f***ing pretending like you are.

Also hit up this Alabamian Ford dealer offering a free Bible, Shotgun, and American flag with any new or used vehicle purchase for 4th of July:

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/alabama-car-dealership-offers-free-shotgun-bible-and-american-flag-to-customers-230134318.html

On topic though:

I'd like to hear what your plans would be for the Alabamian economy/schools in this age of globalism.

And you're right in saying I'm not a rightist

As I've said with PISA, the US stands revealed. Lots of Americans don't like that and try and undermine PISA. But it's used for a reason.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
As I've said with PISA, the US stands revealed. Lots of Americans don't like that and try and undermine PISA. But it's used for a reason.

Because under PISA, the US is a middle of the road performer

Stigma's point was spot on though:

Originally posted by Stigma
But what immediately comes to mind is the fact that, as the article says, despite spending three times less money on a student, Poland outperforms the US.

Thus, what the US could learn is more effective fiscal policy when it comes to education.

I am sure there are other things to be taken from the Polish success story in that area.

Edit: Should be noted that Poland ranks pretty high under PISA.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
How about evolution, should that be taught in schools friend.

Of course it should be taught.

I never understood the resistance to evolution. I don't believe in God, but even I can recognize that evolution doesn't necessarily prove there is no God.

Originally posted by Surtur
Of course it should be taught.

I never understood the resistance to evolution. I don't believe in God, but even I can recognize that evolution doesn't necessarily prove there is no God.

Because [some] Theist do believe Evolution theory contradicts Creationism, as they beleive that God created man/woman and everything as it, so they can't accept the dual-concept belief that evolution happened but God set the mechanics in place.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
How about evolution, should that be taught in schools friend.

Nope. It's not actual science. Only type of so-called "evolution" that should be taught is micro-evolution which I don't really agree with that name because it's not evolution at all. It's just adaptations and variations within kinds. No new information is actually added. There certainly is zero evidence that a reptile ever became a bird or that a monkey or ape or whatever ever became a human. Zero..zilch. nada. NONE. Period. Taxpayers should not be forced to pay for that tax-funded religion. If someone wants to teach evolution to kids then they should start their own private school.

The subject of origins (whether creation or evolution) should not be taught in public tax-funded schools. The so-called "theory" of evolution has contributed absolutely nothing to real science...NOTHING. Charles Darwin was an epic-level loser who never had a real job so he studied birds and he stupidly thought that because birds had a common ancestor (which was an actual bird, btw) that it meant that all lifeforms are related. That's sheer lunacy. Nearly all of the major branches of science were started by a creationist.

The teaching that everything sprang into being from absolutely nothing in a "big bang" & that life somehow "scientifically" began from inorganic matter and that all life forms are related is the biggest hoax in the history of our planet (and no, I don't think it's billions of years old because the evidence actually indicates otherwise).

Not only is that "theory" dumb it's dangerous. Hitler, Mao, and Stalin were all ardent evolutionists and they actually thought that the mass murders they were commiting were helping the human race "evolve" by getting rid of all the so-called "inferior" people.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Nope. It's not actual science. Only type of so-called "evolution" that should be taught is micro-evolution which I don't really agree with that name because it's not evolution at all. It's just adaptations and variations within kinds. No new information is actually added. There certainly is zero evidence that a reptile ever became a bird or that a monkey or ape or whatever ever became a human. Zero..zilch. nada. NONE. Period. Taxpayers should not be forced to pay for that tax-funded religion. If someone wants to teach evolution to kids then they should start their own private school.

The subject of origins (whether creation or evolution) should not be taught in public tax-funded schools. The so-called "theory" of evolution has contributed absolutely nothing to real science...NOTHING. Charles Darwin was an epic-level loser who never had a real job so he studied birds and he stupidly thought that because birds had a common ancestor (which was an actual bird, btw) that it meant that all lifeforms are related. That's sheer lunacy. Nearly all of the major branches of science were started by a creationist.

The teaching that everything sprang into being from absolutely nothing in a "big bang" & that life somehow "scientifically" began from inorganic matter and that all life forms are related is the biggest hoax in the history of our planet (and no, I don't think it's billions of years old because the evidence actually indicates otherwise).

But the oldest fossil is billions of years old.

http://www.oldest.org/animals/fossils/

**** poland

Originally posted by gold slorg
**** poland

PC still unfinished?

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Nope. It's not actual science. Only type of so-called "evolution" that should be taught is micro-evolution which I don't really agree with that name because it's not evolution at all. It's just adaptations and variations within kinds. No new information is actually added. There certainly is zero evidence that a reptile ever became a bird or that a monkey or ape or whatever ever became a human. Zero..zilch. nada. NONE. Period. Taxpayers should not be forced to pay for that tax-funded religion. If someone wants to teach evolution to kids then they should start their own private school.

The subject of origins (whether creation or evolution) should not be taught in public tax-funded schools. The so-called "theory" of evolution has contributed absolutely nothing to real science...NOTHING. Charles Darwin was an epic-level loser who never had a real job so he studied birds and he stupidly thought that because birds had a common ancestor (which was an actual bird, btw) that it meant that all lifeforms are related. That's sheer lunacy. Nearly all of the major branches of science were started by a creationist.

The teaching that everything sprang into being from absolutely nothing in a "big bang" & that life somehow "scientifically" began from inorganic matter and that all life forms are related is the biggest hoax in the history of our planet (and no, I don't think it's billions of years old because the evidence actually indicates otherwise).

Not only is that "theory" dumb it's dangerous. Hitler, Mao, and Stalin were all ardent evolutionists and they actually thought that the mass murders they were commiting were helping the human race "evolve" by getting rid of all the so-called "inferior" people.

Originally posted by Surtur
PC still unfinished?

Originally posted by Surtur
But the oldest fossil is billions of years old.

http://www.oldest.org/animals/fossils/

The dating method they use to date fossils is total BS. They date the fossils by the rock layer the fossil (they call it an "index fossil"😉 is found in. Guess how they decide how old the rock layer is? By how old they say the fossil is lol. It's circular reasoning. It's like me saying the Bible is the Word of God and then someone asking me "well, how do you know?" and I answer "because the Bible itself says it is." I admit that is circular reasoning even though I fully believe it is the Word of God. The difference is I'm not trying to make taxpayers pay for what I believe to be taught in schools.

All the dating methods they use to date rocks are grossly inadequate. There's plenty examples of them throwing out the results of a dating method (like carbon dating, for example) they used on rocks if they later find out the rock was in a different rock layer than what the results of their tests indicated.

I don't really care to take the time to post all the examples of why the earth or the universe couldn't possibly be billions (or trillions) of years old but here are a few: comets still existing (everytime a comet passes the sun it loses a little bit of itself). Comets can't last billions or even just millions of years with that happening. Evolutionists have tried to explain this away by claiming there is an "Ort Cloud" (term they made up) somewhere outside of our solar system that is constantly making new comets lol. No one has ever actually observed this mythical "Ort Cloud" though.

The recession of the moon: The moon is not nearly far enough away from us for the earth to be billions of years old at the rate the moon is leaving us. Assuming the moon has been consistently leaving us at the same rate since the earth was formed it would've been right on top of us not much more than over a million years ago. The moon being in that close would've caused all kinds of problems because of the huge tides it would've caused.

Carbon 14 still present in diamonds: diamonds are supposedly one of if not the oldest substance on the planet yet large amounts of C-14 are still present in them. How is that possible if the earth is billions of years old? C-14 can't last anywhere near that long. And diamonds are one of the hardest substances on earth so the test samples couldn't have been contaminated.

There are many more examples: not enough salt in ocean, the fact that the continents haven't already eroded flat, the earth's magnetic field problem, soft-tissue showing up in samples of dino fossils, the fact the sun still hasn't burned-out yet etc, etc, etc...

I don't really care to take the time to get in an extended debate over creation/evolution as I just don't have the time (have better things to do).

Anyone who wants to debate someone who is highly-educated on the issue and will even put the debate on You Tube for all to see can call Dr. Hovind's secretary at 1-800-Big-Dino (ext. 2, iirc) to set-up a debate with Hovind himself. You don't have to go on camera you can just debate over the phone with him.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
The dating method they use to date fossils is total BS. They date the fossils by the rock layer the fossil (they call it an "index fossil"😉 is found in. Guess how they decide how old the rock layer is? By how old they say the fossil is lol. It's circular reasoning. It's like me saying the Bible is the Word of God and then someone asking me "well, how do you know?" and I answer "because the Bible itself says it is." I admit that is circular reasoning even though I fully believe it is the Word of God.

All the dating methods they use to date rocks are grossly inadequate. There's plenty examples of them throwing out the results of a dating method (like carbon dating, for example) they used on rocks if they later find out the rock was in a different rock layer than what the results of their tests indicated.

I don't really care to take the time to post all the examples of why the earth or the universe couldn't possibly be billions (or trillions) of years old but here are a few: comets still existing (everytime a comet passes the sun it loses a little bit of itself). Comets can't last billions or even just millions of years with that happening. Evolutionists have tried to explain this away by claiming there is an "Ort Cloud" (term they made up) somewhere outside of our solar system that is constantly making new comets lol. No one has ever actually observed this mythical "Ort Cloud" though.

The recession of the moon: The moon is not nearly far enough away from us for the earth to be billions of years old at the rate the moon is leaving us. Assuming the moon has been consistently leaving us at the same rate since the earth was formed it would've been right on top of us not much more than over a million years ago. The moon being in that close would've caused all kinds of problems because of the huge tides it would've caused.

Carbon 14 still present in diamonds: diamonds are supposedly one of if not the oldest substance on the planet yet large amounts of C-14 are still present in them. How is that possible if the earth is billions of years old? C-14 can't last anywhere near that long. And diamonds are one of the hardest substances on earth so the test samples couldn't have been contaminated.

There are many more examples: not enough salt in ocean, the fact that the continents haven't already eroded flat, the earth's magnetic field problem, soft-tissue showing up in samples of dino fossils, the fact the sun still hasn't burned-out yet etc, etc, etc...

I don't really care to take the time to get in an extended debate over creation/evolution as I just don't have the time (have bertter things to do).

Anyone who wants to debate someone who is highly-educated on the issue and will even put the debate on You Tube for all to see can call Dr. Hovind's secretary at 1-800-Big-Dino (ext. 2, iirc) to set-up a debate with Hovind himself. You don't have to go on camera you can just debate over the phone with him.

I'm disappointed that Star has yet to claim that the reason American schools underperform compared to European ones is because it has more blacks and mexicans.

Oh great... another person who thinks I'm Star. Do you also think I'm Fly as well like some of these other morons do lol? I don't know what Star428 actually thinks about what you just said but I am not a racist, bud. I believe all humans are part of the same blood-line that originated w/Adam & Eve. It is those who believe that certain so-called "races" have "evolved" more than other "races" that tend to be the real racists (like Hitler, for example).

"From one blood God made all the nations of men." I forget the exact book and verse number but I know that it's in there.

Anyone else think star/fly should have a religious themed avatar, would really flesh out the sock-persona some.

Originally posted by Robtard
Anyone else think star/fly should have a religious themed avatar, would really flesh out the sock-persona some.

I would perhaps if I had access to one I really liked. I do like Arnold though lol.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
I'm disappointed that Star has yet to claim that the reason American schools underperform compared to European ones is because it has more blacks and mexicans.

Originally posted by Robtard
Anyone else think star/fly should have a religious themed avatar, would really flesh out the sock-persona some.

Surt's new wingman... Bwahaha

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh great... another person who thinks I'm Star. Do you also think I'm Fly as well like some of these other morons do lol? I don't know what Star428 actually thinks about what you just said but I am not a racist, bud. I believe all humans are part of the same blood-line that originated w/Adam & Eve. It is those who believe that certain so-called "races" have "evolved" more than other "races" that tend to be the real racists (like Hitler, for example).

"From one blood God made all the nations of men." I forget the exact book and verse number but I know that it's in there.