Considering that Cade would be unfamiliar with Zannah's techniques, and that she was capable of overcoming Bane's attempt to take over her entire being although she was unaware of what he had learned in that regard I'd say that standing against her sorcery isn't exactly a cakewalk. I've stated elsewhere the issues with the Bane Trilogy in terms of placing the skills of many of the characters in them, and I only know cursory bits about Cade other than that he shunned his connection to Luke, etc, at the start and and wasn't exactly steeped in the force at the beginning of the whole Krayt saga from my understanding so I don't really have a dog in this fight. My main thing is that I don't get why one, people act like the entirety of Force users during the Sith war were garbage when both what evidence is there as well as context from later in the EU via Kreia, the Krayt saga, etc says otherwise, and two, why there are so many of these threads where it's clear the OP has his or her mind made up and really doesn't care if anything to the contrary is said. It just seems pointless.
There's even less debating in this section than there used to be, just a lot of trolling and name calling for whatever reason.
Originally posted by Ascendancy
Considering that Cade would be unfamiliar with Zannah's techniques, and that she was capable of overcoming Bane's attempt to take over her entire being although she was unaware of what he had learned in that regard I'd say that standing against her sorcery isn't exactly a cakewalk.
I've stated elsewhere the issues with the Bane Trilogy in terms of placing the skills of many of the characters in them, and I only know cursory bits about Cade other than that he shunned his connection to Luke, etc, at the start and and wasn't exactly steeped in the force at the beginning of the whole Krayt saga from my understanding so I don't really have a dog in this fight.
My main thing is that I don't get why one, people act like the entirety of Force users during the Sith war were garbage when both what evidence is there as well as context from later in the EU via Kreia, the Krayt saga, etc says otherwise
and two, why there are so many of these threads where it's clear the OP has his or her mind made up and really doesn't care if anything to the contrary is said. It just seems pointless. There's even less debating in this section than there used to be, just a lot of trolling and name calling for whatever reason.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66I think you have your era's mixed up. Darth Bane existed thousands of years after Kreia and Karness Muur (assuming that's who you're referring to with "the Krayt saga"😉.
There's weakness on both sides of the arguments because too much is left to be inferred rather than directly stated, but there's also too much there to act like the entire era consisted of nothing but rejects who wouldn't even have been fit to serve as second-rate assassins during Palpatine's reign.
I'll check out the link you posted when I get a chance. I'm guessing it's excerpts from the graphic novels/comics?
two, why there are so many of these threads whereit's clear the OP has his or her mind made up and really doesn't care if anything to the contrary is said. It just seems pointless.
Except, I don't have a winner in mind at all. This a match I can see going either way. I slightly lean Cade because of demonstrated capabilities, and hax abilities such as Dark Transfer at his disposal.