American woman stabbed to death in London by Norwegian-Somali man

Started by Withsensibility2 pages

That list might as well be a list of how many black people are in the country.

Its no surprise or coincidence that the more black people in a country, the lower the iq.

Originally posted by Raisen
Sadly this may explain everything

Other source:

https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country

The northern part of Africa ranks much higher due to Arab mixing it seems

Originally posted by Withsensibility
That list might as well be a list of how many black people are in the country.

Its no surprise or coincidence that the more black people in a country, the lower the iq.

You're making it sound like it's the entire black race that is the problem, but it isn't. It's the black culture in America that is the problem. This thug mentality, this mentality of giving respect to criminals. That is who they look up to. They will get on live tv and even tell you this. They don't care. It's just gotten out of control.

Originally posted by Surtur
You're making it sound like it's the entire black race that is the problem, but it isn't. It's the black culture in America that is the problem. This thug mentality, this mentality of giving respect to criminals. That is who they look up to. They will get on live tv and even tell you this. They don't care. It's just gotten out of control.
Then how do you explain black crime rates in predominantly black countries? How do you explain the sharp rise in crime in Argentina and Brazil directly linked to black immigration? Is that due to American media? Are they all fans of ice cube?

Animals within the same species vary greatly. Can we not say that Labrador retrievers are significantly smarter than chihuahuas? Yes. They were bred that way. Also, considering that the out of Africa origination was debunked (black people are the only race that really doesn't have neanderthal dna)
We can see how africans and their relations are so much different than other races. They are physically different with cranial density and longer arms etc.
Why can't we just say it for what it is

I.Q. is not a scientific quantification of intelligence.

Originally posted by Astner
It is non-scientific because it's a test score that doesn't reflect what it's suggested to reflect. Moreover, the largest and most comprehensive MRI study ever conducted in the field of neurobiology suggests that the very idea that intelligence can be measured with a single number is wrong, source.

Black languages are incredibly sinplified with little concept of future thinking, this is after European influence, btw. Native Americans, Aboriginals and Africans, again, were very primitive groups with little understanding of leadership, civilisation ownership etc. The great cities of New York, London, Sydney, Cape Town etc. were built by white Europeans who understood future thinking, ownership, leadership etc. (All things that make Trump great, btw)

This is because of patriarchy. Europe and Asia understood patriarchy. Africans, Native Americans and Aboriginals, did not. Patriarchy teaches discipline, resources and resolvement of conflict, without it, absolute harem. Women had high positions of power in these civilisations and the Europeans managed to take over very easily. Like squashing a bee hive.

Obviously, we are in current year and women have the vote and white people have bred with non-whites, these are the most successful non-whites, btw. Its not that all races are unequal, but the best non-whites, still have white genes inside them. This is because of 100s of years of patriarchy and monogamy from christianity.

So yeah, that might have been a tangent, but I think all points stand.