Originally posted by Q99
I think people underrate average, non stand out jedi/sith. Knights/Warriors/Masters. Too many think if they aren't one of the big names, it doesn't even take any effort to beat 'em even if they're in quantity.
Because the big names are usually named for a reason, because they're good, or at least slightly above average.
Which is what a no-name Jedi usually is.
Originally posted by Jmanghan
Because the big names are usually named for a reason, because they're good, or at least slightly above average.Which is what a no-name Jedi usually is.
Oh, yea, no doubt that normally a no-named master is weaker than a named one, a no-named knight than a named knight, pretty much all the time.
But in vs, you might get the impression that taking on 6 no-names *while* fighting a named foe wouldn't even require looking in their direction. Hence, underrated.
Following come to mind:-
- Darth Bane
- Lord Kas'im
- Darth Zannah
- Hero of Tython
- Barsen'thor III
- Satele Shan
- Dread Masters
- Darth Nox
- Emperor's Wrath
- Emperor's Wrath II
- Darth Marr
- Darth Malak
- Darth Bandon
- Vrook Lamar
- Kao Cen Darach
- Kavar
- Zez Kai-Ell
- Bastila Shan
- Vaylin
- Darth Sion
- Aryn Leener
- Darth Baras
- Meetra Surik
There are likely more. The list is surprisingly large.