Originally posted by h1a8
Well the problem here is that no one on team can damage Nam. He definitely has the strength and speed to damage them though. I almost want to say he solos here (due to durability and strength). He could eventually learn flight and hv if the fight lasts long enough.
What durability feats does he have to suggest he wouldn't be hurt by Thor's charged hammer strikes?
Originally posted by Silent Master
What durability feats does he have to suggest he wouldn't be hurt by Thor's charged hammer strikes?
He's about physically equal to general Zod and Superman. Thor's charged hammer strikes has no feats on the level of the abuse Superman and Zod took without a scratch. The sheer tonnage of force they were getting hit with was immense.
Originally posted by h1a8
He's about physically equal to general Zod and Superman. Thor's charged hammer strikes has no feats on the level of the abuse Superman and Zod took without a scratch. The sheer tonnage of force they were getting hit with was immense.
I see, you haven't even seen the first Thor movie. that does explain a few things.
Originally posted by Silent MasterI did. You mean the lightning Thor called down to destroy the ground in the beginning of the movie. Is it me or did Thor get considerably weaker when he joined the avengers?
I see, you haven't even seen the first Thor movie. that does explain a few things.
Anyway I don't see than as a charged hammer strike but summoning lightning. Unless you are referring to something else?
Whatever you want to call those attacks, Nam-Ek has no feats to suggest he could tank them.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
I thought breaking the bifrost was Thor's big feat from the first movie? Anyway the only real fight here is nam ek vs kurse. Thor's lighting doesn't really effect the ironman suits and abomination was on par with hulk. I think nam ek is stronger but we don't know kurse's limit.
A lightning blast might not work, but there is no reason to assume his charged hammer shots wouldn't kill Warmachine.
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
The attacks Thor was giving out in TDW to malekith were equal to Supes. He was destroying massive steel and concrete pillars>skyscraper windows.Initial shockwave he produced in Sokovia atomized like 40 buildings, bifrost blast, jotunheim glacier land thing, forest strike with cap, I mean c'mon.
You have to forgive h1, he automatically reduces Marvel feats by 99.9%, while increasing DC feats by 999.99%.
Superman took a direct nuclear bomb. Just saying. Nam Ek probably could've survived it as well. But maybe Thor is too much. It seems like anything he does with his hammer, or that his hammer even partially contributes to, he seems to have an extremely high durability to the resulting environmental damage.
Originally posted by ShadowFyreI disagree. They were not equal to what Superman was doing. They were hitting each other a mile away, even to the top of a skyscraper. The hitting up the skyscraper feat took thousands of tons of force.
The attacks Thor was giving out in TDW to malekith were equal to Supes. He was destroying massive steel and concrete pillars>skyscraper windows.Initial shockwave he produced in Sokovia atomized like 40 buildings, bifrost blast, jotunheim glacier land thing, forest strike with cap, I mean c'mon.
The Sokovia feat was a shared feat where Tony overloaded the reactor with energy.
Bifrost is unquantifiable. We don't know its durability. It also took multiple hits to achieve.
So even if Thor hits as hard as Superman then it's not enough since neither Superman or Zod was receiving ANY damage from their fight. Thor would have to hit significantly harder.
Originally posted by Silent MasterActually I'm not completely DC bias. I argue top notch for WB Hulk, SS, Spider-Man, etc.
You have to forgive h1, he automatically reduces Marvel feats by 99.9%, while increasing DC feats by 999.99%.
Also Kurse was putting a serious hurting on Thor. He wasn't shown to be hitting Thor harder than Superman and Zod was hitting each other.
So Nam would probably do worse to Thor.
Lastly, you guys are giving Thor types of strikes that are not practical in a real fight. Look at his fight with Hulk and Kurse. It was only practical for him to do quick one handed swings. These hits didn't knock Hulk or Kurse far away at all. Kurse knocked Thor far away though.
So with you guys logic then Thor should beat Kurse since has he no feats of tanking Thor's top charged hammer strikes.
Originally posted by h1a8
Actually I'm not completely DC bias. I argue top notch for WB Hulk, SS, Spider-Man, etc.
I never seen you vote for a DC character. If you think a DC character wins then you wouldn't even post. You only post in defense to Marvel characters. I have defended Marvel characters over DC many times (Cap over Batman, Spider-Man over WW (although that was stupid), WB over Superman or almost anyone in DC, SS over many characters in DC, etc.
Notice that none of the Marvel characters you claim to support are in this thread, however you have been known to massively downplay Thor while doing the opposite to Superman.
Now let's take a look at the people in this thread, there is Thor and a Superman related character. interesting isn't it?
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilAgreed. Supes in a higher tier than people like Thor and Hulk. It's not a knock against them, but he is Superman. People have b*tched about him being overpowered for decades. It's not a big deal that his movie version still dwarfs most marvel characters.
Because superman is just more powerful. Ants can lift like 500X their weight but its not downplaying to say they loose to a Hercules beetle.
Originally posted by K-Dog
Superman took a direct nuclear bomb. Just saying. Nam Ek probably could've survived it as well. But maybe Thor is too much. It seems like anything he does with his hammer, or that his hammer even partially contributes to, he seems to have an extremely high durability to the resulting environmental damage.
Nam Ek never gained his full Kryptonian powers. So he wouldn't really just be granted as able to do whatever Superman could.
Originally posted by h1a8
The Sokovia feat was a shared feat where Tony overloaded the reactor with energy.
The damage done by his initial attack speaks for itself though.
Also Superman looked more or less dead after the nuke. The way I interpreted the scene was that because it happened in space he was getting greater exposure to the rays of the sun and it more or less brought him back.