Originally posted by LordOfTheLight
Yeah, but draining of sentient beings isnt. Forget that, the Jedi were unaware that such a concept even existed
Then you must be reading a different text form me. In the Tales of the Jedi Companion, there is an article titled Drain Life Essence, which describes a power that allows Force users to "draw life from those around him". The article also notes how draining a close relative would make the technique more difficult. I don't think this book is being written for the in-universe plant life and fungi of Star Wars, so when a close relative is mentioned, it's probably in reference to a being with a conscious mind and functioning body.
even from the Sith point of view
Then whatever source your referring to is either poorly written or being badly read.
For electronic manipulation, it is flat out stated that the Jedi are simply unable to use it without entering a deep state of rage.As for illusions, they are outright classified as one of the main Sith disciplines. They arent written alongside dark side powers that the Jedi knew( I also didnt see on the tabulated list of Jedi powers, whereas force drain was). There is a difference.
I repeat the premise again. In regards to what the entirety of this forum is based on - pitting x Force user against another, the relevance of these abilties being weakly manifested by modern jedi is inconsequential to their fighting success. Qui Gon Jinn's electronic manipulation might help him against HK-67, but it won't help him fight Tott Doneta. Likewise, Yareal Poof can telepathically manifest any entity of his desire into the mind of others, it wouldn't matter against Nomi Sunraider, who learned how to dispel illusions as a knight, and used the technique in an actual confrontation. Do you also think that Obi Wan draining a newborn child allows him to hurt Ulic Qel Droma, who could shield himself from the Dark Reapers Force harvester? On the other hand, every single PT order Jedi bar Anakin is venerable to a mass draining device and probably dies to an individual who can masterfully weird the power.
Next, no, Ood Bnar compiles this around 3998 BBY, and the present timeline is exactly as such. Recent times means times around this date. Not to mention, Ood Bnar writes this for the future generation of Jedi and will take their perspective into account, not his.
When the text is written is irrelevant. What matters is that "recent times" isn't given a specific date. "Around this date" is also relative given how far Jedi history, or less specifically, galactic civilisational history spans. Then you have to consider the narrative style. A 90 year old man might think of recent times as being anything from the year 2000 onwards. Here we have the perspective of a 1000 year old Jedi master talking about "recent times" where civilisation history spans 200,000 years. To him recent times could be as far back as 50 years, perhaps even 100 or more. That doesn't change based on who he's addressing, especially if those people are future generations of Jedi.
I am unaware of the event in detail and I havent played the game, so I cant really comment. However a few things:1. Credibility of the source-coming from a dubiously canonical game, even in the Legends continuity? Games have had ridiculous stuff before. Which while not a reason to dismiss it outright, it really doesnt hold much weight when it stands alone.
The game isn't dubiously canonical, even in Legends. If it has the Star Wars title and the Lucas Arts logo it counts as c-canon (with the exception of the "infinities series"😉. As for it's authority within in the Lore I have to disagree. Video games tend to be massive co-operate projects with a lot of money, time and people spent working on them. This is as appose to Fact File #302923 or the long since inactive blogs found on the Wizards of the Coasts website. Furthermore, those sources tend to just contain an analysis of the mythological events, while the Clone Wars video game counts as stuff that actually happened in the mythos. It's pretty hard to deny it's place within the lore. This isn't the same as sequences in the ROTS game that get explicitly contradicted within the movies either.
2. As I said, I am unaware of the details. However, it could also be that both Yoda and Mace knew force drain resistance, but the way they learned was through the light side which takes a lot of time and effort. Time which they probably didnt have to teach Anakin, and they would be involved in other stuff anyways. If another way existed by which Anakin could be taught drain resistance by a different, quicker way, they would spring for it. Is it explicitly stated that they didnt know how to counter drain? Because otherwise we cant really make any assumptions.
While this is a nice suggestion, it's not a parsimonious one. "If Dooku restores the Dark Reaper... it will mean the end of the republic." The entire situation becomes laughable if they know how to resist drain, even more laughable if they can teach it to Anakin but choose not to.
3. The Jedi would have full knowledge of how to counter drain(if they didnt have so already) after this. Which kind of renders the vs part of your argument moot. [/B]
The confirmation that Ulic Qel Droma's tomb on the planet Rhen Var, contained the technique would then be known to the Jedi. Correct. However, I doubt that even a single one of them would have traveled to seek out the information. Let's put this into perspective, Mace and Yoda were already aware that Ulic's tomb might contain the power to resist drain, but never once decided to explore the artefact in their life times, even after the sith revealed themselves in TPM. The only reason they consider Ulic's knowledge is in the urgent event that the Dark Reaper is revived, a weapon than Anakin destroys soon there after. So of course, the incentive to seek out the knowledge simply has already been rid of... and as you said before "they probably would be involved in other stuff anyways"...