Galen Marek and Sith Stalker Marek (TFU & TFU: USE) vs Starkiller and Dark Starkiller

Started by Jmanghan2 pages

Galen Marek and Sith Stalker Marek (TFU & TFU: USE) vs Starkiller and Dark Starkiller

Galen Marek from TFU and Sith Stalker Marek from TFU: Ultimate Sith Edition

vs.

Starkiller Clone from TFU II and Dark Starkiler from the TFU II DLC

Who takes this?

Not sure. Galen should be the MVP but the DA's power level is ambiguous and hinted at being even greater then Galen's. SS and SK should be about on par as combatants.

Team 1 steamrolls

TFU II team. Both are superior to either on team TFU.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Not sure. Galen should be the MVP but the DA's power level is ambiguous and hinted at being even greater then Galen's. SS and SK should be about on par as combatants.
I disagree.

Sidious seems to act like Galen Marek as of USE has lost so much of himself, when in reality, he doesn't really lose that much, nowhere NEAR as much lost potential as Vader had.

He didn't have to change up his saber style, was still just as powerful in the force, and had more powers, to boot.

If anything, I feel like he improved in all aspects as of the end of USE.

Dunno where to Quantify DSK, but I feel like the first one going down is SK on team 2.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
I disagree.

Sidious seems to act like Galen Marek as of USE has lost so much of himself, when in reality, he doesn't really lose that much, nowhere NEAR as much lost potential as Vader had.

He didn't have to change up his saber style, was still just as powerful in the force, and had more powers, to boot.

If anything, I feel like he improved in all aspects as of the end of USE.

Dunno where to Quantify DSK, but I feel like the first one going down is SK on team 2.

Can you give me one of his showings that hint at him being equally powerful in the Force? Granted his knowledge and skill would have grown but unless we have evidence proving otherwise his augmentation and combative force abilities would have diminished.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
TFU II team. Both are superior to either on team TFU.

DA is potentially superior though he has no showings to back this assertion up, only Vader's commentary. Starkiller is blatantly not.

mmm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

Starkiller is just an upgrade spite of his mental stability. He's better in every regard otherwise.

Vader stated that the clone was weaker than the original.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Can you give me one of his showings that hint at him being equally powerful in the Force? Granted his knowledge and skill would have grown but unless we have evidence proving otherwise his augmentation and combative force abilities would have diminished.
Beating ESB Luke while having a power boost?

Beating Ben Kenobi, who was arguably ANH Vader's equal.

I'd actually argue USE Marek toyed with ESB Luke.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Beating ESB Luke while having a power boost?

Beating Ben Kenobi, who was arguably ANH Vader's equal.

Those aren't inherently power related though...

Originally posted by Jmanghan
I'd actually argue USE Marek toyed with ESB Luke.

This is probably true, yes.

Originally posted by Tondemonai
Vader stated that the clone was weaker than the original.

Could you post the quote?

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
TFU II team. Both are superior to either on team TFU.

Proof SP?

Originally posted by Tondemonai
Vader stated that the clone was weaker than the original.

If we're going by what Vader says, then Dark Starkiller is more powerful than Galen ever was.

https://youtu.be/X93zuZg15OM?t=154

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Proof SP?

Uh, I'll try to get on that later, do you mind waiting until tomorrow night?