When did Obi Wan surpass Fisto?

Started by Jmanghan4 pages

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
Yes but TCW Grievous sucking makes little difference. Kit pwned, Kenobi stalemated.
It does make a difference when the guy who made the ****ing show admits to purposely making him LESS of a challenge.

Why do you think no one takes TCW Grievous low showings seriously?

Its for that very reason.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
And here's Zoltan stepping up to defend beloved Obi-Wan?

Well it's a fact that Grievous wasn't fully charged when Kit fought him. Considering the only reason he can hang in there with Force users is because of his impressive cybernetics that's quite a blow to his effectiveness.

Do you also think Kit >>> SoD Maul?

Early-mid CW.

So you're saying against the same shit robot, the guy who stalemates and the guy who wins just doesn't matter? It's all the same?
Everything should be disregarded?

And this 'fully charged' Grievous thing is just a handy excuse.

Well you seem to disregard everything alright. Like circumstances and how retarded your ABC logic is.

The Great chingchangwalla has spoken! Kit Fisto > Amped SoD Maul.

👆

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Well it's a fact that Grievous wasn't fully charged when Kit fought him. Considering the only reason he can hang in there with Force users is because of his impressive cybernetics that's quite a blow to his effectiveness.

Do you also think Kit >>> SoD Maul?


No. The comic made Grievous badass again, where he should be. So you reckon Eeth Koth > Fisto, Zoltan? Because fully charged Grievous got smoked by someone far less skilful than Fisto.

God, it's almost as if TCW is inconsistent mmm

So now blaming it on inconsistencies? If so, everything can just be countered with that.

Yes, I'm blaming inconsistency. Still better than thinking Fist, Koth > Maul.

When did Koth "smoke" Grievous? Lol.

'almost'
He force pushed into a window, went in for the kill against a defenceless Grievous and Magnagaurds intervened.

For the record, I do think Fisto is capable of beating Grievous, but I don't think he'd find it nearly as easy as in TCW.

Originally posted by chingchangwalla
'almost'
He force pushed into a window, went in for the kill against a defenceless Grievous and Magnagaurds intervened.
Anyone can Force push Grievous lol, but he was getting trashed in sabers.

Grievous is too inconsistent in TCW to actually take seriously.

I think ChingChang really wants Grievous to be weak, and he's upset that he isn't.

Lmao you're the most retarded person here I'm afraid. Fisto doing better against Grievous than Kenobi within the same medium is a valid argument, and "hurr durr Grievous is inconsistent" is a shit-tier response. Try harder.

On the other hand seems to me that you are the one shedding salty tears by making this about how lame Grievous is in Canon. Kek.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Lmao you're the most retarded person here I'm afraid. Fisto doing better against Grievous than Kenobi within the same medium is a valid argument, and "hurr durr Grievous is inconsistent" is a shit-tier response. Try harder.

On the other hand seems to me that you are the one shedding salty tears by making this about how lame Grievous is in Canon. Kek.

I'm using the fact that Filoni has admitted that he made Grievous weaker.

Which, whether you like it or not, HAS to be taken into consideration, seeing as every other source portrays him as an awesome Jedi-Killing bad-ass who can make 3-4 seasoned masters look like a complete joke. While, in the show, he always has to use something other then his own skill to kill anything above a Padawan, and even thats being generous.

Grievous not being fully-charged is a valid argument thats already been made considering Grievous' state as of his duel with Fisto.

So? It's the same Grievous. Filoni's Grievous. Your argument would only make sense if we were comparing say Fisto's performance against Grievous in TCW with Shaak Ti's performance against Grievous is OCW.

And yeah, its also the only valid argument. But I'd like to see the quote tbh.

"I still don't believe that, at this point -- one-to-one -- that Grievous could really take out someone like Ventress in a lightsaber fight. I mean, it's just me, but he doesn't have the Force. He can't wield it. I don't see how he can hope to be as proficient as a Jedi or a Sith could be fighting with a lightsaber, which is why he's always willing to dirty play at the end of the day."

"Yeah, it's in the movie. Mace Windu says, "General Grievous will run and hide, as he always does." He's an interesting character for all that thought. And obviously, you know, he's adept at using lightsabers, but I always thought his thing was fear. If you are afraid of the many swirling blades, then you'll parish staring at them. But if you can just focus through it, you can defeat that opponent. "
—David Filoni