Why does Jumanji have such a low Rotten Tomatoes score?
I loved Jumanji when it first came out back in 1995 and have rewatched it sporadically over the years. I think it holds up as a fun, imaginative fantasy film. The characterizations aren't out of this world or anything, but I find nothing bad at all about them. Robin Williams and Kirsten Dunst especially I found to be memorable. I read Roger Ebert's review, and he seemed very hung up on the idea that these kids were actually in peril, and he didn't like that. He gave Zathura(A similar premise by the author of Jumanji Chris Van Allsburg) a higher rating because the kids in that movie weren't actually in danger of getting killed. To me, while I do like Zathura, Jumanji spoke to me a lot more for the very reason that there WAS consequences to the game. Jumanji in many ways is like a kid friendly version of Hellraiser. You open the box, and all this peril comes out, and if you're lucky and resourceful enough, you might be able to survive. So what gives?