The Outlander vs Galen Marek

Started by Jmanghan2 pages

The Outlander vs Galen Marek

1. Sabers

2. Force

3. All-Out

Outlander
Galen
Galen

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Outlander
Galen
Galen

🙂

Galen takes all unless a ship crashes into him and gives Shitlander an advantage in footwork

👆

Couple of the shittest chars, Galen wins tho

Galen sweeps.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Outlander
Galen
Galen

Galen

Marek, obviously.

Why's Galen taking sabers?

Why wouldn't he? His performance against Vader is better than anything Arcann can do, let alone Shitlander.

They're both still sub Kenobi.

But above Kun 🙂

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Why wouldn't he? His performance against Vader is better than anything Arcann can do, let alone Shitlander.

What puts Legends pre-ANH Vader over Arcann or HoT as a swordsman?

Originally posted by SunRazer
What puts Legends pre-ANH Vader over Arcann or HoT as a swordsman?

He's still a master of 7 forms, has slaughtered notable Jedi like An'ya Kuro, slaughtered multiple Jedi at once, and is still a more infamous duelist than anyone Hero has beaten up to this point. Is beating Tol Braga and Angral really outside of Galen's abilities as a duelist? Outlander didn't even definitively outskill Arcann

Originally posted by carthage
He's still a master of 7 forms, has slaughtered notable Jedi like An'ya Kuro, slaughtered multiple Jedi at once, and is still a more infamous duelist than anyone Hero has beaten up to this point. Is beating Tol Braga and Angral really outside of Galen's abilities as a duelist

An'ya has nothing to her name as a duelist, unless I'm missing something. HoT beating Angral in Act I is beyond that. You'd be better off citing the fight against Roan Shryne.

Quote for mastering all forms? And that doesn't make him above HoT, either.

The Hero is also a master of 7 forms, defeated amped versions of the Orders best Jedi, beat Scourge halfway into her development, bitzed Sith easily and is the best duelist of the age barring Arcann and the Wrath.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
But above Kun 🙂

no

Do you want to say that Sedriss>Galen? No? Sedriss is >Kun, as Wollf proved, so Galen>Sedriss>Kun 🙂