Another Friday Email Release from the FBI.

Originally posted by Surtur
See so once again I just have to ask: do you legitimately feel it's not a big deal if Obama truly knew about this server and lied about it to the American public?

This is what some people do. They try to deride a potentially legitimate issue by bringing up something silly(like the Kenyan stuff).

I would, but how many more emailgate 'gotcha'! moments am I supposed to hold my breath for when all the previous ones fizzled out into the substance-less farts they were?

Originally posted by Robtard
I would, but how many more emailgate 'gotcha'! moments am I supposed to hold my breath for when all the previous ones fizzled out into the substance-less farts they were?

Keep in mind I never said fully jump the gun. Even I asked more than once in this thread about the details just to be 100% sure before jumping to conclusions. Even now I am not 100% sure if Obama would have known that he was sending her emails on the specific server he said he knew nothing about. I do find it strange he used a pseudonym. This could be standard procedure for all I know though.

Basically I'm going to definitely be keeping an eye on this one. All of her other moments were rather tame in comparison to the president potentially lying to everyone for her.

Notice how the question was dodged. People will never answer the question when Obama is caught in a bold faced lie. Basically Obama is justified in his lie, because he's the president, in their minds.

Originally posted by Politico
Notice how the question was dodged. People will never answer the question when Obama is caught in a bold faced lie. Basically Obama is justified in his lie, because he's the president, in their minds.

We definitely need more information though. Specifically: is it common practice to use pseudonym's like this? Or is that act in and of itself..suspicious?

Originally posted by Politico
Notice how the question was dodged. People will never answer the question when Obama is caught in a bold faced lie. Basically Obama is justified in his lie, because he's the president, in their minds.

You're really on roll today. But his question was directly answered with my "I would" comment, if you go read my response you'll see it, as it's the opening.

"On a roll today" with another "if you go read this"

"I would" rhetorically, is not "I am or I do"

Huh? "I would" is a direct answer to his question. He asked if I would care; I responded with what is essentially a 'yes'. "I would [care]."

Not sure what you mean with your use of 'rhetorical', if you're now saying his question was rhetorical, then he didn't really expect a direct answer and you're really not making sense now.

Anyhow, his question was answered and he seemed to accept it.

You "would care." Is not "I do care the president lied."

Your position takes the stance that the story is fact, when it's still an unknown. Condemning people before they're proven guilty is something the crazy Islamic countries do; America doesn't practice that.

Nice try, an investigation can prove something without going to trial. Are you not aware of this? Are you suggesting that a person is only guilty of something until they go through a court room? Are you also suggesting that this source is lying as well as the FBI?

While I realize that you already condemned Obama from just the headline, your story is vague and puts it forth as an unknown:

"The report doesn't provide more details on the contents of that particular email exchange, but says it took place on June 28, 2012, and had the subject line: "Re: Congratulations." It may refer to the Supreme Court's ruling that day upholding a key portion of the Obamacare law."

So yeah, I'm going to wait until more is revealed before I condemn Obama because he used a pseudonym.

Yes, we need to know if it's common practice or not to use pseudonyms. Even if it's not common, I would like to know why it happened in this specific case.

Originally posted by Robtard
While I realize that you already condemned Obama from just the headline, your story is vague and puts it forth as an unknown:

"The report doesn't provide more details on the contents of that particular email exchange, but says it took place on June 28, 2012, and had the subject line: "Re: Congratulations." It may refer to the Supreme Court's ruling that day upholding a key portion of the Obamacare law."

So yeah, I'm going to wait until more is revealed before I condemn Obama because he used a pseudonym.

Incorrect, it does not matter if he used a pseudonym or his real name, and you know this. It matters that he lied and said he had no idea she had a private server and that he found out when everyone else did. Which was a lie, again nice try.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/obama-hillary-clinton-personal-email-115899

Bit odd that your buddy Surtur feels the same, that he's going to wait until we know more before codemning Obama and you didn't have a problem with that.

So Josh Earnest is lying now?

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/obama-hillary-clinton-personal-email-115899

Now sure why you're asking me that as I a never commented on Josh Earnest, but imo, it appears we have another situation of where reading the headline and then not following through to the story is poor idea. From that link and in Earnest's own mouth:

The point that the president was making is not that he didn’t know Secretary Clinton’s email address, he did,” Earnest said. “But he was not aware of the details of how that email address and that server had been set up or how Secretary Clinton and her team were planning to comply with the Federal Records Act."

Remember when Bernie was gonna win nominee because we all hate Hillary who literally rigged the ballet? Remember dat Trump is literally hitler and only idiots support Trump cos CNN told us so? Remember Pepe is a white nationalist symbol? Remember Hillary doesnt have poor health apart from a literal collapse on 911?

Ye, lets vote Hillary. Drumpf. Lmao. Shes gonna get destroyed tonight!

Originally posted by Awoovement
Remember when Bernie was gonna win nominee because we all hate Hillary who literally rigged the ballet? Remember dat Trump is literally hitler and only idiots support Trump cos CNN told us so? Remember Pepe is a white nationalist symbol? Remember Hillary doesnt have poor health apart from a literal collapse on 911?

Ye, lets vote Hillary. Drumpf. Lmao. Shes gonna get destroyed tonight!

#triggered

"Rebuttal"

Originally posted by Robtard
Now sure why you're asking me that as I a never commented on Josh Earnest, but imo, it appears we have another situation of where reading the headline and then not following through to the story is poor idea. From that link and in Earnest's own mouth:

The point that the president was making is not that he didn’t know Secretary Clinton’s email address, he did,” Earnest said. “But he was not aware of the details of how that email address and that server had been set up or how Secretary Clinton and her team were planning to comply with the Federal Records Act."

It appears you have a problem with repeating yourself and saying the exact same thing over and over. And again, I will tell you take you're own advice.

"When pressed on whether Obama was aware that Clinton was conducting business over her private email, Earnest responded, “the point is the president did email with Secretary Clinton. I assume that he recognized the email address that he was emailing back to,” before saying that the important issue is whether she complied with the Federal Records Act."

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...9#ixzz4LOWFOZbF
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook