They were all on the same canon tier back before Disney. So basically they are equal.
Sure you can argue why a specific feat in one version is inaccurate to some degree or entirely, but you can't just arbitrary throw away sources or rank them like Syn does.
If you have a quote that for example puts the novel ahead of any other version like how the movies are above their novels, then sure I accept it. But until then it's just your own preference, and nobody is required to indulge it.
Originally posted by cs_zoltan
They were all on the same canon tier back before Disney. So basically they are equal.Sure you can argue why a specific feat in one version is inaccurate to some degree or entirely, but you can't just arbitrary throw away sources or rank them like Syn does.
If you have a quote that for example puts the novel ahead of any other version like how the movies are above their novels, then sure I accept it. But until then it's just your own preference, and nobody is required to indulge it.
When there's a source which is a third person unbiased descriptive version of events versus a source which is contradicted not only by its other game counterparts but is never even hinted at in the other sources I know which version I'm going with.
Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
When there's a source which is a third person unbiased descriptive version of events versus a source which is contradicted not only by its other game counterparts but is never even hinted at in the other sources I know which version I'm going with.
Yes, you are going with the source that best supports your wanking. At least have the courtesy of not denying it...
Even if I didn't think Galen was underrated this is the stance I'd take.
If we had a text based description of Malgus's fight with the strike team do you think I'd bother to take the game mechanics into account to justify what I think happened?
Hell no! I'd praise Sidious that there was a third person text description and use that as the primary source rather then arguing Malgus choked out HoT and Thor or Nox and Wrath.
Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Even if I didn't think Galen was underrated this is the stance I'd take.If we had a text based description of Malgus's fight with the strike team do you think I'd bother to take the game mechanics into account to justify what I think happened?
Hell no! I'd praise Sidious that there was a third person text description and use that as the primary source rather then arguing Malgus choked out HoT and Thor or Nox and Wrath.
Except I don't use gameplay "feats" from the game, only cutscenes so that fell flat.
For each version to be true story of Starkiller you have to be adept in multiverse theory, in which case, every thread he exists in should be titled with a prefix before his name. If you're referring the to wii version of Starkiller, you should address him as Wii Starkiller and only reffer to the chosen medium alone.