Darth Bane vs. TPM Maul

Started by The Ellimist3 pages
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
I wasn't aware one of the most powerful sith lords in the history of Banite Sith

He's actually the weakest by design. Every Banite sith was more powerful than the previous.

Feats and accolades say otherwise.

If this logic is applied then the very first Sith -Xoxann and Murr- get shat on by Kun. So that train of thought is inherently flawed.

Originally posted by MercyZiegler
Feats and accolades say otherwise.

If this logic is applied then the very first Sith -Xoxann and Murr- get shat on by Kun. So that train of thought is inherently flawed.

The rule of two is special, but thanks for bringing up accolades:

For a millennium, the Sith maintained the order in secrecy, passing down their evil heritage. As they gained knowledge of the dark side of the Force, their powers increased with each generation.
Source: Epsidode 1: The Phantom Menace Scrapbook

Originally posted by The Ellimist
The rule of two is special, but thanks for bringing up accolades:

For a millennium, the Sith maintained the order in secrecy, passing down their evil heritage. As they gained knowledge of the dark side of the Force, their powers increased with each generation.
Source: Epsidode 1: The Phantom Menace Scrapbook

That's nice?

That only applies to Sith that have surpassed their masters. Clearly Maul didn't. Cause ya kno, he lost his dick to a Padawan Kenobi.

But that's fine go ahead and ignore the setback the Sith suffered when Gravid went rogue. Denial is always expected amidst defeat

Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith.

And no, you can't apply that to other Sith Orders. It's only ever mentioned for Bane's Order of the Sith Lords.

Maul, Tyranus and Vader don't get scaling, though.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith Masters

FTFY

Edit: Damn ****ing Nova you ninja ****

Originally posted by MercyZiegler

But that's fine go ahead and ignore the setback the Sith suffered when Gravid went rogue. Denial is always expected amidst defeat

The setback was in knowledge, not raw power. Gean still succeeded in killing Gravid, so she still grew more powerful. The cycle still continued. And the newest sourcebooks, published well after Darth Plagueis only reiterate the fact that each generation of Banite Sith was more powerful than the last.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith.

And no, you can't apply that to other Sith Orders. It's only ever mentioned for Bane's Order of the Sith Lords.

Maul, Tyranus and Vader don't get scaling, though.

I'm not sure if it's a troll account or not.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
I'm not sure if it's a troll account or not.

I don't call troll on everyone who denies it, but yeah, the facts are arrayed in our favor.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
FTFY

Edit: Damn ****ing Nova you ninja ****

🙂

Originally posted by MercyZiegler
Feats and accolades say otherwise.

If this logic is applied then the very first Sith -Xoxann and Murr- get shat on by Kun. So that train of thought is inherently flawed.

Kun isn't shitting on Muur.

That was his point, lol.

Tbf, the Banite progression doesn't prove that Bane < Maul any more than it proves that Sidious < Maul, but it does make it pretty plausible.

Originally posted by SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith.

And no, you can't apply that to other Sith Orders. It's only ever mentioned for Bane's Order of the Sith Lords.

Maul, Tyranus and Vader don't get scaling, though.

So the quote is irrelevant and Bane still stomps Maul?

Make sense. Can I please get my guys and my bitches and some weed now?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
FTFY

Edit: Damn ****ing Nova you ninja ****

👆

Bane stomps.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Tbf, the Banite progression doesn't prove that Bane < Maul any more than it proves that Sidious < Maul, but it does make it pretty plausible.

Sounds like a Jack alt again, actually. lol

Originally posted by MercyZiegler
So the quote is irrelevant and Bane still stomps Maul?

Carthage, we need you.

Wait, he shits on Maul even harder than Bane now. Hmmm....

It becomes something of what you consider more impressive. Obviously, Maul can be called into question for failing against Padawans multiple times, his mediocre force feats, and his inconsistent showings. But Bane's feats are hardly better, lol

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Bane stomps.

Good man.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
I'm not sure if it's a troll account or not.

Sock? Troll? Dafuq?

Originally posted by carthage
It becomes something of what you consider more impressive. Obviously, Maul can be called into question for failing against Padawans multiple times, his mediocre force feats, and his inconsistent showings. But Bane's feats are hardly better, lol

Honestly, TPM Obi Wan and Erza are more impressive than mercenaries and Farfalla.

Originally posted by MercyZiegler
I wasn't aware one of the most powerful sith lords in the history of Banite Sith needed a reason to crush Maul at this stage?

But if you need one then then I'll humour you.

Kasim>Qui Gon

Raskta>Obi Wan and Komari Vosa

Zannah>All of them.

Lol, Qui-Gon > Kas'im
Obi-Wan as of ROTS > Raskta
Tholme/Smoke > Zannah

Originally posted by McP
Lol, Qui-Gon > Kas'im
Obi-Wan as of TPM > Raskta
Tholme/Smoke > Zannah

Fixed.