Originally posted by MercyZiegler
Feats and accolades say otherwise.If this logic is applied then the very first Sith -Xoxann and Murr- get shat on by Kun. So that train of thought is inherently flawed.
The rule of two is special, but thanks for bringing up accolades:
For a millennium, the Sith maintained the order in secrecy, passing down their evil heritage. As they gained knowledge of the dark side of the Force, their powers increased with each generation.
Source: Epsidode 1: The Phantom Menace Scrapbook
Originally posted by The Ellimist
The rule of two is special, but thanks for bringing up accolades:For a millennium, the Sith maintained the order in secrecy, passing down their evil heritage. As they gained knowledge of the dark side of the Force, their powers increased with each generation.
Source: Epsidode 1: The Phantom Menace Scrapbook
That's nice?
That only applies to Sith that have surpassed their masters. Clearly Maul didn't. Cause ya kno, he lost his dick to a Padawan Kenobi.
But that's fine go ahead and ignore the setback the Sith suffered when Gravid went rogue. Denial is always expected amidst defeat
Originally posted by MercyZieglerBut that's fine go ahead and ignore the setback the Sith suffered when Gravid went rogue. Denial is always expected amidst defeat
The setback was in knowledge, not raw power. Gean still succeeded in killing Gravid, so she still grew more powerful. The cycle still continued. And the newest sourcebooks, published well after Darth Plagueis only reiterate the fact that each generation of Banite Sith was more powerful than the last.
Originally posted by SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith.And no, you can't apply that to other Sith Orders. It's only ever mentioned for Bane's Order of the Sith Lords.
Maul, Tyranus and Vader don't get scaling, though.
I'm not sure if it's a troll account or not.
Originally posted by SunRazer
Accolades make each Banite Sith more powerful than the last, lol. Bane's the weakest of the Banite Sith.And no, you can't apply that to other Sith Orders. It's only ever mentioned for Bane's Order of the Sith Lords.
Maul, Tyranus and Vader don't get scaling, though.
So the quote is irrelevant and Bane still stomps Maul?
Make sense. Can I please get my guys and my bitches and some weed now?
Originally posted by Emperordmb
FTFYEdit: Damn ****ing Nova you ninja ****
👆
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Tbf, the Banite progression doesn't prove that Bane < Maul any more than it proves that Sidious < Maul, but it does make it pretty plausible.
Sounds like a Jack alt again, actually. lol
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
So the quote is irrelevant and Bane still stomps Maul?
Carthage, we need you.
Wait, he shits on Maul even harder than Bane now. Hmmm....
Originally posted by carthage
It becomes something of what you consider more impressive. Obviously, Maul can be called into question for failing against Padawans multiple times, his mediocre force feats, and his inconsistent showings. But Bane's feats are hardly better, lol
Honestly, TPM Obi Wan and Erza are more impressive than mercenaries and Farfalla.
Originally posted by MercyZiegler
I wasn't aware one of the most powerful sith lords in the history of Banite Sith needed a reason to crush Maul at this stage?But if you need one then then I'll humour you.
Kasim>Qui Gon
Raskta>Obi Wan and Komari Vosa
Zannah>All of them.
Lol, Qui-Gon > Kas'im
Obi-Wan as of ROTS > Raskta
Tholme/Smoke > Zannah