Originally posted by DarthAnt66
I'm not arguing there's no power growth, but I don't think it's as big as you're making it out to be.If SoR Revan can one-shot Kenobi, I imagine MW Revan is at least superior in the Force for the reasons I highlighted.
I don't think you have much evidence that the power growth was slight; just an over-analysis of a colloquial statement by a pathological liar isn't enough. Or do you also buy her claim that the ancient sith were far beyond Revan?
Meanwhile, I think the most reasonable claim would be that Revan, on the massive amount of knowledge he allocated in his journeys after the Mando wars, depicted through his holocron, would have gotten a sizable boost in power. It's happened for other sith, like Bane (going from being "no match" for Kas'im to beating him, with the only activity in the middle being Revan's holocron), Exar Kun, Caedus, etc. It also hardly makes sense that Revan would have achieved most of his potential by his, what, late twenties?
And again, there's the fact of the matter that Darth Revan apparently isn't that far above Malak, but then a fatigued KotOR Revan defeated a stronger version of Malak who was being amped by the star forge. That hardly seems like a slight growth to me.
Likewise, there's Revan's substantially superior performance against Vitiate the second time around, and his confidence in SoR that he was now more powerful than him. Plus, the "more powerful than any Jedi could imagine" doesn't sound like "only slightly more powerful than the Revan everyone was very familiar with".