Pirates of the Carribean 5 (2017)

Started by Patient_Leech7 pages
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]I found the 4th movie better then pts 2 & 3 TBH.... [/B]

Originally posted by Firefly218
This is the worst thing you've said

The best thing 2 and 3 had going for them was Bill Nighy and his cool tentacle face. The 3rd one was pretty much awful. It's been a while since I've seen any of them. The 4th one was probably a little better than 2 and 3, but I remember the final sequence feeling like an obvious indoor soundstage.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
The best thing 2 and 3 had going for them was Bill Nighy and his cool tentacle face. The 3rd one was pretty much awful. It's been a while since I've seen any of them. The 4th one was probably a little better than 2 and 3, but I remember the final sequence feeling like an obvious indoor soundstage.
I really enjoyed 2 and 3. 2 has a charming story and in 3 the maelstrom is some of the coolest shit I remember.

4 has no soul and feels like something commercial and glib. Hopefully 5 will reverse course

Fair enough. I do respect Gore Verbinski as a filmmaker. They were surprisingly experimental big budget Disney blockbusters.

Originally posted by Firefly218
I really enjoyed 2 and 3. 2 has a charming story and in 3 the maelstrom is some of the coolest shit I remember.

4 has no soul and feels like something commercial and glib. Hopefully 5 will reverse course

👆

The movie is being held for ransom by internet pirates

https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/05/report-new-pirates-of-the-caribbean-being-held-for-ransom-by-internet-pirates/

Irony.

Originally posted by Firefly218
I really enjoyed 2 and 3. 2 has a charming story and in 3 the maelstrom is some of the coolest shit I remember.

4 has no soul and feels like something commercial and glib. Hopefully 5 will reverse course

👆

On Stranger Tides was terrible; everything about it was boring and stale. 2 and 3 at least was fun and entertaining, and we had Elizabeth Swann and Will Turner in it instead of irrelevant, blank-slate characters with no development.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
2 and 3 at least was fun and entertaining,

Agree about 2 & 3. I actually Love 2 almost as much as I love the first one.

The trailer said its the final movie of this series. No doubt as in sequels I wouldn't be surprised if they make prequels.

If that isn't true as not the last sequel then it's utterly nonsensical and moronic to advertise it in the trailer.

From the Young Pretty Boy Jack in the trailers I can see them going for the Fan Girl Wank Effect and Tween Booking up a Prequel.

Cause Twilight and Shaded of Gray has taught us is that Girls and Gays will watch the SHITTIEST OF STUPID SHIT!

I'm not worried about that at all. -shrug-

"After this fifth episode, you'll wish Disney would just declare the franchise dead and tell no more tales."

May 22, 2017
Mark Kennedy
Associated Press
Top Critic

😂

It's got a different title here: "Salazar's Revenge"

It is movies like this that make me wish there was still a $1 theater in the area. You still get the fun of Going out to the Movies, but only cost a buck.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]It is movies like this that make me wish there was still a $1 theater in the area. You still get the fun of Going out to the Movies, but only cost a buck. [/B]

👆

Yeah, we have a $2.50 theater here. I love it. It used to be $1.00, but it's steadily gone up a little to help stay in business, which is fine by me because we had another $1.00 theater in town but I think it just closed down instead.

Yeah. I think there is still a "Dollar Theater" in the Big Shitty near by, it is kind of run down and ratty but depending on the type of movie that just adds to the charm of it.

The film wrapped shooting almost two years ago. You only hold a movie back that long for three reasons: 1. It's owned by one person (George Lucas & Star Wars, George Miller & Mad Max: Fury Road, Francis Ford Coppola & Apocalypse Now) and they will release it when they think it's finished (or they are a serious auteur and won't be rushed - Stanley Kubrick, David Lean etc.); 2. The films requires a LONG time in CGI rendering (Avatar, John Carter); or 3. It's crap and they know it (George Lucas & Red Tails, Seventh Son and many other films.)

I'm going with...Option 3. 😛

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
👆

Yeah, we have a $2.50 theater here. I love it. It used to be $1.00, but it's steadily gone up a little to help stay in business, which is fine by me because we had another $1.00 theater in town but I think it just closed down instead.

We have Cheap Arse Tuesdays here.
$13 tickets instead of $22.

The irony is...buying a large frozen slushee brings the total back up to $22. 😠

YouTube video

^^^if thats anything to by, its roughly what i've been expecting. 👆