NYT does a complete reversal on Trump's losses

Started by Sin I AM2 pages

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Oh please, in Real Life (tm) we do that all the time, from taking medication with side effects to putting your arms down when you fall to protect your head. It's just cost benefit analysis. Not that I think Clinton is an "evil".

Like, what do you think she'll even do that's sooooo awful?

I think the general argument is that they're both "corrupt"...people just tend to favor one side over the other if they just so happen to coincide with their beliefs.

Trump is significantly more corrupt than Hillary.

So again: yay! The lesser of two pieces of shit. Our country will thrive.

You yourself said they are both bad, but Trump is worse.

So again: yay for shitty people in power who are corrupt and manipulative liars. Yay for incompetence, yay for people who were in politics 30 years and are still too stupid to know protocol.

Oh and yay for people who get called incompetent by the FBI.

You know what guys just don't mind me or the things I say. I'm just burnt out. This is one of the first elections I really paid a lot of attention to, really cared about it and I'm realizing it's all irrelevant, I am irrelevant, we all are.

We lack power, so we're irrelevant in the grand scheme of things when it comes to politics. There isn't even a point in arguing about it anymore.

This has shown me it's not worth it to care, because I can't change a damn thing. I'm just going to go back to what I did before and just not care at all about it.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Clinton foundation uses 5-6% of its income for humanitarian purposes.

The rest goes to money laundering for the Clintons.

The Clinton Foundation is a 4 out of 4 star-rated charity, with 86.9% of its total expenses spent on the programs and services it delivers.

The State Department already investigated the Clinton Foundation and found no evidence of self-dealing or pay-for-play, unlike the Trump Foundation which is actually guilty of both.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The Clinton Foundation is a 4 out of 4 star-rated charity, with 86.9% of its total expenses spent on the programs and services it delivers.

The State Department already investigated the Clinton Foundation and found no evidence of self-dealing or pay-for-play, unlike the Trump Foundation which is actually guilty of both.

The Clinton foundation passes out watered down aids drugs.
Nuff said

Originally posted by Surtur
So again: yay! The lesser of two pieces of shit. Our country will thrive.

You yourself said they are both bad, but Trump is worse.

So again: yay for shitty people in power who are corrupt and manipulative liars. Yay for incompetence, yay for people who were in politics 30 years and are still too stupid to know protocol.

Lol, at this point you're just repeating yourself rather than responding to anything I'm saying. The lesser of two evils is a perfectly reasonable settlement to take when there are no superior alternatives. We do this in Real Life all the time, as has been explained to you before. I'm sure you've done this when you've chosen to pay a parking ticket over refusing to and going to jail.

And no, I don't think Hillary is evil.

Nyt did a complete reversal, shows how dumb and hypocritical they are.

Why didn't they care when Soros and Buffet lost a billion dollars and used it as a loss.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Lol, at this point you're just repeating yourself rather than responding to anything I'm saying. The lesser of two evils is a perfectly reasonable settlement to take when there are no superior alternatives. We do this in Real Life all the time, as has been explained to you before. I'm sure you've done this when you've chosen to pay a parking ticket over refusing to and going to jail.

And no, I don't think Hillary is evil.

Who said we don't do shit like this in real life? I never did. I'm just saying it's f*cked up beyond belief that we're using it when it comes to a president though.

I mean think about this, we've been debating about WHO IS SHITTIER. Not about who will do the best job, but on who is the least corrupt, the least prone to lies.

That is our reality, that is our president: the person who was shitty, but just not AS shitty, as Trump.

Does not matte what anyone says, the NYT did a full reversal on his losses in 1995.

They praised him for making a comeback.

This nation is so backwards now, that making a comeback is considered a a failure now, and being a career political failure like Clinton is a success.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Trump is significantly more corrupt than Hillary.

Its not shocking really. Its just a direct correlation to how we are as a society. Its basically showing us our mirror image.

Complete reversal

Of course he NYT would praise Trump back then. He was still a Democrat back then
😉

Originally posted by jaden101
Of course he NYT would praise Trump back then. He was still a Democrat back then
😉

😂👆