Originally posted by Deronn_solo
I still haven't seen a quality reason to take novel blurbs/publisher summaries as gospel.
I mean, the Publisher's Summary needed to be LucasArts approved and, unless something in our out of universe contradicts it(besides the "feats only" mindset) there's no reason to assume it's wrong.
Originally posted by SunRazer
Nothing is ever "gospel", bar the films themselves. But it's something nevertheless.
I pretty much take most sourcebook statements gospel, yeah. Like, if a Star Wars encyclopedia says Maul is more powerful than Dooku, or something along those lines, then I'm inclined to believe it until contradicted.
Originally posted by MythLord
I mean, the Publisher's Summary needed to be LucasArts approved and, unless something in our out of universe contradicts it(besides the "feats only" mindset) there's no reason to assume it's wrong.
So are the Insiders vs series, and that one book that has Vader beating Yoda, and Plo > Talzin.
Sorry if I'm a bit skeptical by something that is strictly there to grab attention, and sell books.