Based on the number of people that have to come into contact with the Clintons, in order for me to believe that the Clintons are up to something with all these deaths, I'd have to see something that proved these numbers are statistically significant compared to the population average. And we have fairly decent population numbers from which to compare (in statistics, we have to use sample statistics and hope those are close to what we'd see from the entire population because it is impossible to, say, ask every single person currently living inside of the USA who they would vote for in the presidential election of 2016).
And we can probably figure out the ages of all of those people at the point of their suicide and then compare their suicides with the suicide rates of the population at that age range, too.
The number of people that come directly into a regular contact with the Clintons is a number we just don't know. So I don't know how we can compare "suicide" rates. 😐
Originally posted by dadudemon
Based on the number of people that have to come into contact with the Clintons, in order for me to believe that the Clintons are up to something with all these deaths, I'd have to see something that proved these numbers are statistically significant compared to the population average. And we have fairly decent population numbers from which to compare (in statistics, we have to use sample statistics and hope those are close to what we'd see from the entire population because it is impossible to, say, ask every single person currently living inside of the USA who they would vote for in the presidential election of 2016).And we can probably figure out the ages of all of those people at the point of their suicide and then compare their suicides with the suicide rates of the population at that age range, too.
The number of people that come directly into a regular contact with the Clintons is a number we just don't know. So I don't know how we can compare "suicide" rates. 😐
Stop sciencing, filthy liberal.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Based on the number of people that have to come into contact with the Clintons, in order for me to believe that the Clintons are up to something with all these deaths, I'd have to see something that proved these numbers are statistically significant compared to the population average. And we have fairly decent population numbers from which to compare (in statistics, we have to use sample statistics and hope those are close to what we'd see from the entire population because it is impossible to, say, ask every single person currently living inside of the USA who they would vote for in the presidential election of 2016).And we can probably figure out the ages of all of those people at the point of their suicide and then compare their suicides with the suicide rates of the population at that age range, too.
The number of people that come directly into a regular contact with the Clintons is a number we just don't know. So I don't know how we can compare "suicide" rates. 😐
Ok, how many people do you know that have killed themselves?
Compare that to the clintons who have close to 80 people directly around them that have killed themselves, many from two shots to the back of the head in a suicide😂
Bro its obvious they have killed people.
All the sudden her spinal surgeon who is healthy, successful and has a family just kills himself?
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Ok, how many people do you know that have killed themselves?Compare that to the clintons who have close to 80 people directly around them that have killed themselves, many from two shots to the back of the head in a suicide😂
Bro its obvious they have killed people.
All the sudden her spinal surgeon who is healthy, successful and has a family just kills himself?
Well, the suicide rate for the US is 12 per 100,000 people.
So if the Clintons have personally interacted with 666,666 people (80 people suicided...divide that by 12 and then multiply that by 100,000 to find how many people they would need to have interacted with for their numbers to match up with the population suicide rate), then the suicides we are seeing are right on target for what we would expect. Anymore than that then we would have to use statistics to "test for statistical significance" to ensure that the numbers above an expected rate are significant enough to say, "Woah, bitches, hold on...something fishy is going on with the Clintons."
Now, at first, I am tempted to say that 666,666 is a very ominous number because each triplet of the number of six represents one of the Clintons (Bill and Hillary) and, therefore, the Clintons are a twin representation of the Antichrist, but I am just kidding but it is a rather humorous coincidence. 😄
Anyway, the extreme number of people that have to interact with the Clintons is DEFINITELY in the tens of thousands. Maybe even hundreds of thousands. But I am not too sure about all the way to 666,666. That's why we'd have to test for statistical significance before we can conclude that these "suicides" are out of wack.
Another site says it is 46 people, not 80.
So I'd be more inclined to believe that this is just coincidence and not actually a legit issue.
Originally posted by jaden101
Stop sciencing, filthy liberal.
I find that if you treat TI as an intelligent, educated, respectable person, he's far more likely to change his mind about an argument or debate. Obviously, that doesn't work with everyone but TI seems easier to work with than others in these types of discussions from my experience. For instance, I'm an obstinate a**hole who can hardly be convinced of anything. 🙂
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
We know your answer though, you refuse to believe anything negative about the Clintons. Literally you think all these deaths are just a coincidence.
I think DDM raised a fairly good point, considering how many people the Clintons come in contact with in their years of public service, I'm not sure how we can fairly judge if their six-degrees-of-death is unusual. Do you?
Originally posted by Robtard
I think DDM raised a fairly good point, considering how many people the Clintons come in contact with in their years of public service, I'm not sure how we can fairly judge if their six-degrees-of-death is unusual. Do you?
Because of the strange circumstances behind all the deaths. How many times do I have to say something? Suicides don't result with two bullets in the back of your head.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Suicides don't end up with two bullets in the back of their head tho. And they dont move after they kill themselves, like Vince Foster. He killed himself in one place, and was found miles away in a forest where they found his body.
I think you make a good point, here. Then we'd have to move the discussion somewhere else and then measure the Clintons performance against other major political figures and see if they are statistically different. From what I understand, politics can literally be cut-throat and involve a certain criminal element. For instance, the Italian Mafia was once highly inmeshed with the top political players for decades in the 20th Century. So much so that you had to make back room deals with key mafia members to get elected or get your political agendas pushed through.
But now I think I'm getting a bit off topic. Homocide rate in the US and Suicide rate in the US...we can just simply expand my point to include homicides and suicides and separate the cases that seem like homicides and separate out cases that seem like suicides and then compare like data sets to like data sets.
The US homicide rate is 3.9 per 100,000. So if we pull all of the cases that you think are homicides (and not clear suicides), we may even see that the homicides are below the population average. Meaning, being around the Clintons may increase the likelihood of suicide (stressful job/lifestyle), but decreases the likelihood of homicide/being murdered.
To make my opinion more clear:
I don't think there is any statistical significance to the suicide rate for people that are around the Clintons and I think the homicide rate for clear cases of homicide are actually less than the population average.
The logical conclusion should be that working at the highest level of politics is EXTREMELY stressful and we will see more suicides than expected in that profession.
Go look at that list of people. You can google each and every name if you really want to get to the bottom of it. Then look at each circumstance and you will see foul play. These are not just like "Oh he killed himself"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Vince_Foster#The_Clinton_Chronicles:_A_Political_Firestorm
As to your last point about it being stressful, if it was that bad, why are there not a trail of dead bodies, mysterious deaths and suicides around Obama?
At this point the number of dead around them rivals Sam and Dean Winchester.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
For ****s sake man, could you possibly contain this to one or a handful of Clinton threads instead of spamming ****ing ten a day?!
I know, it gets in the way of all the other intellectually stimulating threads people post on a daily basis.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008
Podesta talks about an assassination plot.
I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down From: John Podesta [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 4:36 PM To: Steve Elmendorf <[email protected]> Subject: Thanks Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.