Originally posted by cs_zoltanLol.
Yes power, the most important thing in a sith empire.
Malgus is dead, the DMs turned on the Empire and the Emperor is presumed dead. Good try tho.Adding criteria to the accolade doesn't exactly help your point.
Which is Thanaton...Right, and Marr threatening to kill a kid Thanaton 30 years ago proves... what again?
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Lol.
You object?
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Adding criteria to the accolade doesn't exactly help your point.
I'm not adding anything to it. The accolde comes from the time of RotHC when all the people you mentioned were not part of the Empire. So your attempt to dismiss the accolde based on arbitrarily adding people to it is a failure.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Right, and Marr threatening to kill a kid Thanaton 30 years ago proves... what again?
That he can oneshot him 30 years ago, are you this dense? Besides Marr's also the most powerful, and longest serving member of the Dark Council, so frankly nobody cares about your opinion that you can't see him beating Thanaton.
Originally posted by cs_zoltanConsidering it was Marr's strategic and leadership abilities that led to the Empire's successes, not his sparkle hands, yes.
You object?
I'm not adding anything to it. The accolde comes from the time of RotHC when all the people you mentioned were not part of the Empire. So your attempt to dismiss the accolde based on arbitrarily adding people to it is a failure.My point is that you're eschewing a general reading by putting it into contexts, the contexts of Marr's desire to strengthen the Empire (which he did by providing strong leadership) only lending itself to my point.
That he can oneshot him 30 years ago, are you this dense? Besides Marr's also the most powerful, and longest serving member of the Dark Council, so frankly nobody cares about your opinion that you can't see him beating Thanaton.No but you certainly appear to be, given you've failed to prove why it's relevant now or that Marr was actually capable of one shotting him at all. That said you've also clearly got the wrong end of the stick, as I never claimed Marr could not beat Thanaton.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Considering it was Marr's strategic and leadership abilities that led to the Empire's successes, not his sparkle hands, yes.
Which he did as a frontline warrior, as repeatedly noted 😬
Originally posted by Beniboybling
My point is that you're eschewing a general reading by putting it into contexts, the contexts of Marr's desire to strengthen the Empire (which he did by providing strong leadership) only lending itself to my point.
Considering the Codex entry doesn't once mentioned his leadership skills, but it mentioned his fighting skills I find that hard to believe.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
No but you certainly appear to be, given you've failed to prove why it's relevant now or that Marr was actually capable of one shotting him at all. That said you've also clearly got the wrong end of the stick, as I never claimed Marr could not beat Thanaton.
Nox only stomped an already defeated Thanaton, if Marr can defeat him, then he can stomp him afterwards.
Originally posted by cs_zoltanIn the past, where he was outclassed by people like Malgus. Within the contexts the entry is made he's sitting on his ass while people like Nox and the Wrath do the heavy lifting, something the entry itself notes.
Which he did as a frontline warrior, as repeatedly noted 😬
Considering the Codex entry doesn't once mentioned his leadership skills, but it mentioned his fighting skills I find that hard to believe.It states his intentions to leave behind a strong Empire, from which you appear to have inferred means him being second to none refers to loyal Imperials alone, yet not what he was actually doing to strengthen the Empire at the time?
Nox only stomped an already defeated Thanaton, if Marr can defeat him, then he can stomp him afterwards.He did more than that, as I've already explained he demonstrated gross superiority over him, you haven't proven Marr could do the same.
First of all, use ****ing line breaks in your posts. It's a pain to quote it you phag.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
In the past, where he was outclassed by people like Malgus.
On what ground is Malgus outclassing him? And what does Malgus has to do with this, we are talking about Nox (and the Wrath).
Originally posted by Beniboybling
Within the contexts the entry is made he's sitting on his ass while people like Nox and the Wrath do the heavy lifting, something the entry itself notes.
What of it. So was Yoda, and Sidious, and Ben and the list goes on.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
It states his intentions to leave behind a strong Empire, from which you appear to have inferred means him being second to none refers to loyal Imperials alone, yet not what he was actually doing to strengthen the Empire at the time?
And who says they are in the same context? The codex were listing things about Marr. His dedication to the Empire, and that his abilities were second to none. Beside being in the same sentence they have nothing to do with each other, it's called a list.
For the second time. What the codex actually talks about: His battlefield prowess, what it doesn't talk about: his leadership skills. And leadership is hardly the only way to leave a stronger empire behind.
Also how ****ing awkward is to phrase his leadership skills that way...You are just reading into the quote.
Originally posted by Beniboybling
He did more than that, as I've already explained he demonstrated gross superiority over him, you haven't proven Marr could do the same.
I have, you just didn't care. Act II 'thor being in the oneshot range for Marr certainly proves that to me.