Originally posted by InhumanConcession accepted. It was never said of him.
This just goes to show you have never seen the movies about the characters you try to argue against vs your favorite characters you always want to give the auto win.👇
Originally posted by Silent Master
Is h1 ever going to post proof to back up his claim?
What claim?
Originally posted by juggerman
To me it looks like the explosion is coming from under the buildings. Pause at 54-56 seconds to see what I mean.I'm of the opinion Thor's strike caused the core to basically bust which is what caused all that surface destruction we see. That wasn't all Thor. Which is why I think the Jotunheim Buster is a better example of Thor's power. There was no reason the think that one was assisted in any way while this one is questionable as to how much was his doing alone
Plus Thor amped the strike with lightning. Plus Mjolnir adds to striking power. Plus Iron Man overloaded the engines. All these things take a lot away from the feat.
Originally posted by h1a8
Concession accepted. It was never said of him.
With that reply you have ignorantly conceded. Again shows you dont see the movies about the characters you try to argue against.
Evidence has to be spoon fed to you in these vs. fight threads because you have never seen the footage in the first place.
2:25 , Korath says it and Ronan agrees by his statement.
lets see how you will try to weasel out of this one or try to downplay what is said/shown on screen.
Originally posted by juggerman
To me it looks like the explosion is coming from under the buildings. Pause at 54-56 seconds to see what I mean.I'm of the opinion Thor's strike caused the core to basically bust which is what caused all that surface destruction we see. That wasn't all Thor. Which is why I think the Jotunheim Buster is a better example of Thor's power. There was no reason the think that one was assisted in any way while this one is questionable as to how much was his doing alone
I watched the vid, the surface explosion takes place as soon as Thor makes his strike. There's no scene that shows it coming from underneath, the shockwave looks like it's round street level.
It might be true that your theory is correct but you're going to have to prove it. Did Stark even mention that the core is explosive?
Originally posted by h1a8
Concession accepted. It was never said of him.What claim?
Plus Thor amped the strike with lightning. Plus Mjolnir adds to striking power. Plus Iron Man overloaded the engines. All these things take a lot away from the feat.
I'm going to take your inability to back up your claims as a concession.
Originally posted by h1a8
What was my claim? That it was the writer's intention that Superman did it the same way Reeve did it?That's just common sense.
No it's not. You literally have no proof to show that you know what writer's intent was. The writer's intent could have easily just been that that was a tabloid newspaper that usually writes crap news articles.
Originally posted by FrothByte
No it's not. You literally have no proof to show that you know what writer's intent was. The writer's intent could have easily just been that that was a tabloid newspaper that usually writes crap news articles.
Writer's intentions are usually clear. This is a fact.
The writer wants the viewer to remember the Reeve feat and APPLY IT to this Superman.
If the writer had in mind that Superman didn't use strength, LIKE Reeve did, but rather some other device then he would have given details in order to not mislead the viewers. And he certainly wouldn't have referenced the Reeve feat at all.
This is common sense. Debating against it is trolling at it's finest.
Originally posted by h1a8
Writer's intentions are usually clear. This is a fact.
The writer wants the viewer to remember the Reeve feat and APPLY IT to this Superman.If the writer had in mind that Superman didn't use strength, LIKE Reeve did, but rather some other device then he would have given details in order to not mislead the viewers. And he certainly wouldn't have referenced the Reeve feat at all.
This is common sense. Debating against it is trolling at it's finest.
All you're doing is giving your opinion, now either post proof or don't bother responding.
Originally posted by FrothByte
I watched the vid, the surface explosion takes place as soon as Thor makes his strike. There's no scene that shows it coming from underneath, the shockwave looks like it's round street level.It might be true that your theory is correct but you're going to have to prove it. Did Stark even mention that the core is explosive?
I don't recall what Stark said exactly. I'll have to rewatch when the plan was laid out. As I said to me it looks as if the destruction is primarily coming from beneath. I like Thor and I'm not trying to take anything away from him but this is a shared feat imo.
The Jotunheim Buster is above anything Supes did in the striking department. I think we all can agree there
Originally posted by h1a8
Writer's intentions are usually clear. This is a fact.
The writer wants the viewer to remember the Reeve feat and APPLY IT to this Superman.If the writer had in mind that Superman didn't use strength, LIKE Reeve did, but rather some other device then he would have given details in order to not mislead the viewers. And he certainly wouldn't have referenced the Reeve feat at all.
This is common sense. Debating against it is trolling at it's finest.
Writer's intention was clear: it was only an easter egg. This is not an opinion, it's fact. It's common sense.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Writer's intention was clear: it was only an easter egg. This is not an opinion, it's fact. It's common sense.
Ironic you calling people out for common sense, when it's pretty common sense that Hulkbuster can easily take out the warriors three.
"Asgardians cannot be hurt by Hulkbuster cause it's made by Tony Stark."
😂
Originally posted by FrothByteIt doesn't matter what you called it. Being an easter egg or Bugs Bunny doesn't make something not canon. If something was the intention of the writer to have occured in a movie then it occurred in canon. The name you give things doesn't change that fact.
Writer's intention was clear: it was only an easter egg. This is not an opinion, it's fact. It's common sense.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Dude stop it
Why troll me? The writer's intentions are clear. He wants the viewer to think of the Reeve feat. This is common sense.
Even a child can understand that. You must have a low IQ to not see this. And that's a fact.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Stop lying.
The writer WANTS you to think about the Reeve feat. This is a fact.