Originally posted by h1a8
So you don't believe writer's intentions are usually clear?Here's some facts
1. The writer WANTED the viewers to think about and remember the Reeve feat.
2. The writer tied MOS to the Reeve feat via the headline.
You don't know that, that is only yours assumption. The writer may have had something entirely different in mind.
Originally posted by FrothByteYou keep arguing as if this shit is real. We don't know how trustworthy the newspaper was? Really? The newspaper doesn't exist, this is a movie. Superman never existed. The intentions of the writer is what actually happened. Stop making stuff up.
We don't even know how trustworthy that newspaper is. Was it just some random tabloid? Was the article factual?
Originally posted by h1a8
I stated facts. Not opinions. Try again.
The writer WANTED the viewer to think and remember the Reeve feat.
Prove that what you posted was a fact and not just your opinion.
Originally posted by h1a8
You keep arguing as if this shit is real. We don't know how trustworthy the newspaper was? Really? The newspaper doesn't exist, this is a movie. Superman never existed. The intentions of the writer is what actually happened. Stop making stuff up.
Are you going to provide proof, or are you just going to keep repeating your opinion?
Originally posted by h1a8
You keep arguing as if this shit is real. We don't know how trustworthy the newspaper was? Really? The newspaper doesn't exist, this is a movie. Superman never existed. The intentions of the writer is what actually happened. Stop making stuff up.
And again I tell you, you have no idea what the writer's intent was. There's no way for you to win this. In the mvf, it's feats that count, not your interpretation of writer's ntent.
Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
Really, did the writer tell you that? No? Then it's not a fact.
Really? Are you this dumb?
So the writer posted a feat that Reeve did and doesn't want the viewers to know it? Basically, the writer doesn't want the viewer to remember the Reeve feat even though he's showing the headline of the feat. Super dummy.
Originally posted by FrothByteIt's common sense. Arguing against it means you are bias against Superman in favor of Thor.
And again I tell you, you have no idea what the writer's intent was. There's no way for you to win this. In the mvf, it's feats that count, not your interpretation of writer's ntent.
Originally posted by h1a8
Really? Are you this dumb?
So the writer posted a feat that Reeve did and doesn't want the viewers to know it? Basically, the writer doesn't want the viewer to remember the Reeve feat even though he's showing the headline of the feat. Super dummy.
Given that you can't tell the difference between fact and opinion, should you really be commenting on the intelligence of other posters?
Originally posted by h1a8
It's common sense. Arguing against it means you are bias against Superman in favor of Thor.
It's not debatable what the writer was trying to show the viewers. And i already won regardless of what you say.
Prove it.
Originally posted by h1a8
It's common sense. Arguing against it means you are bias against Superman in favor of Thor.
It's not debatable what the writer was trying to show the viewers. And i already won regardless of what you say.
Common sense implies that something makes sense to majority of people. Thus the term common. Majority of people here think what you're saying is senseless, which means it can't be common sense.
What yoi have is your opinion, plain and simple. If it was truly common sense then you wouldn’t need to defend it.
Originally posted by h1a8
Really? Are you this dumb?
So the writer posted a feat that Reeve did and doesn't want the viewers to know it? Basically, the writer doesn't want the viewer to remember the Reeve feat even though he's showing the headline of the feat. Super dummy.
It doesn't matter. You're taking a small Easter Egg and multiplying it to the nth degree, Cavill hasn't done anything to prove he can hold a candle to Reeve, strength or otherwise.
Just because someone is giving a small nod and wink to Reeve doesn't suddenly mean Cavill can just start stopping Earth quakes with his bare hands, despite all evidence to the contrary, and you sitting over there derping about writers intent doesn't change that.