Darth Vader vs. Arcann

Started by Azronger2 pages

I think it's good to play the devil's advocate with our least favorite characters sometimes. That way we can develop new counters when debating against them.

Vader steamrolls

Vader.

Vader sweeps.

Vader's better, yeah. Arcann makes him work for it in all rounds, though.

I'm curious the actual argument (supported by feats and accolades) that put Vader noticeably ahead of Arcann. What I'm looking for: saber feats to put him over Arcann, Force feats to put him over Arcann.

Vader's force feats showings such as telepathically commanding Cyclo's massive Living ship to fly into a star, collapsing towers, using barrier to withstand the explosion of Cymoon 1 (One of the largest Imperial bases), exploding Lyleks (A Lylek is a massive insect with a hide thicker than armor/that can besiege cities), destroying an AT-AT, shredding Vulture droids with a wave of his hand, manipulating freighters, blowing a massive hole into ETA shuttles by just being angry, etc (these are all only his canon showings)

As for saber feats in canon he's beaten Ahsoka who has fought evenly with Maul, who in turn was stomped by Ben Kenobi. If we're using composite versions he's beaten Ben Kenobi, Galen Marek, Starkiller, fought off multiple Jedi off at once while being in his suit for only a month, and was considered the greatest living swordsmen in the OT era.

Beating Ben who stomped Maul is frankly better than anything Arcann has done.

Vader all.

Vader sweeps.

Vader. And malachor explosion>>>>>>>any of arcann's feats

Vader barely

Vader embarrasses him.

Vader stomps