Originally posted by Deadline
Ok some good points and if somebody is accused of rape it should be looked into but I've seen in some cases that it's not credible. If somebody has been accused of rape that doesn't mean they did it we need to look at the evidence. However Bill Clinton still has a much longer history.With Bill Clinton there's an incident when he was at University in England.
It seems like the core of your argument is "Bill is a more prolific rapist", yeah? While that might very well be true, Bill is not running for office.
We also have Trump bragging on audio and video how he does whatever the **** he wants with women, cos he's rich.
So this really just seems like more Bill distraction, which imo, is silly, no offense.