Trump has retracted his statement about ban all muslims, but considering Hillary has done deals with Saudi Arabia and Qatar who funded ISIS and caused the immigration crisis in Europe, maybe we should ban deals with those muslims until we can find out what is going on.
Well, now we know what was going on. Neocon war hawk corrupt politicians are whats going on and Hillary is one of them.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
No, she isn't. At the very least she isn't a mentally unstable megalomaniac who may or may start a nuclear war over some politician insulting her hair.
He actually takes the hair stuff as a joke, always has.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Nor does she want to ban all muslim immigrants, go after terrorists' families, re-institute torture programs, ban abortion, repeal obergefell v. hodges, etc. Furthermore, pretty much every foreign leader takes her significantly more seriously than Trump. There's no question who's the more competent commander in chief.
So why did she pick an anti-abortion running mate? Why did she propose racial profiling on muslims?
She used to be pro torture, until she flip flopped again on Obama.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/feb/01/barack-obama/clinton-changed-on-torture/
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Beyond the fact that he essentially bragged about sexually assaulting women on camera, there are an incredible amount of legal issues his businesses are going under, many of which are pretty much impossible to defend him on. Take Trump University, for instance. Or the workers he literally refused to pay. Or his "foundation".
She laughed about getting a rapist off and said she knew he was lying.
How about her foundation that stole hundreds of millions from the people.
How about the largest for profit university in the world in which they prey on minority nations and minorities and enslave them into debt? And paid the Clintons $16.5 million dollars. And the hundreds of thousands of students are struggling to pay back their outrageous loans?
Originally posted by The Ellimist
How about openly threatening assassination on Hillary?
or
Joe Biden threaten to kill Obama?
YouTube video
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Politifact and pretty much any objective analysis of their respective speeches disagree. Hillary may or may not lie on certain occasions; Trump literally lies every single time he opens his mouth, even on issues with which he gains absolutely nothing from lying about. And you'e more naive than anybody you're trying to sway if you don't think Trump has engaged in far more dishonest business tactics - you know, like not paying federal income taxes the past 18 years.
Warren Buffet and George Soros and Hillary Clinton use the same tax loop holes.
She lied at least 39 times to the FBI, 30-40 times to congress, and lied about 100 times to the American people about her emails.
She also said "she could not recall" on all her answers
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/14/clinton-does-not-recall-ordering-destruction-emails-from-personal-server-in-testimony.html
Funny, she can remember ever word Trump says, but can't remember anything regarding her job?
Originally posted by The Ellimist
He's also a crackpot conspiracy theorist who thinks global warming was a hoax started by the Chinese, vaccines cause autism, and the election is going to be "rigged".
She is also a crack pot conspiracy theorist
YouTube video
How much money did Trump make by inheriting his daddy's money and then building a bunch of hotels using workers he refused to pay?
The Clintons made $250,000,000 after leaving the white house, what did they produce or sell to make that money? Oh thats right, they sold out America.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
At least the Clinton Foundation has legitimately helped save people's lives, and done its share to alleviate poverty in the third world; the Trump foundation is at least as corrupt, but has none of the accomplishments.
Tell that to the Haitian people, and the people in Africa who got watered down aids drugs.
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Clinton was called upon to take that case. She was a lawyer, you know. And she didn't get him acquitted. But he is a rapist, yes.
So she had to defend someone she knew she was guilty and then laugh about it?
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Trump isn't the lesser evil by any reasonable metric. He's less intelligent, less emotionally stable, has a statistically worse track record with respect to honesty, is a rapist, and holds cancerous social and fiscal views that would try to push our nation back to the 1940s. He's one of the worst individuals ever to seek high office in our country's history.
You call this stable?
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
YouTube video
There is absolutely no "so and so is the lesser evil" here. Nope, it's just not. We have different kinds of evil, that is all.
If you insist on using the evil term, then it is more correct to say we have candidates that represent different kinds of evil. It just gets old seeing people saying "Well Hilary is the lesser evil". No, she's just BETTER AT IT!