Tulak Hord (power gauge and format)
With the new debating format Ant has made.
is it possible for us to utilize Tulak Hord in a debate if not gauge his power and where it stands against the many of the era's Best?
Where does his skill measure?
How powerful is he in the force?
And who can or cant he defeat?
Based on how he's infinitely superior to the likes of Meetra, Traya, and anyone of the era in terms of lightsaber combat, and more specifically, being a greater swordsman than Sadow, Pall, Ragnos, etc. There's also the fact that all of his implied feats are pretty monstrous, (the Endar Spire feat, his Jedi army solo'ing feat, etc) along with the fact that he consumed the energies of those he killed. He just comes off as somebody far more powerful than the likes of, say, Nyriss, who I think isn't that far off from Dooku.
Originally posted by The MerchantWhat the hell kind of logic is that? The "Golden Age" was an era of peace that the Sith contently spent on the worlds they already owned (instead of going out and conquering).
I was wondering about something. Should Tulak be above Naga Sadow? Ik most would say yes but Sadow being a product of the "Golden age" should have more going for him.
Endar spire - absurdly vague
Army solo'ing - vague and similar to feats by Meetra
Absorbing Jedi energy - no way to tell where this puts him
Being better than Meetra and Traya - who cares?
We know that he's below Ragnos and Kun, who are below Vitiate, who is below Plagueis. Other than that it's tough to say.
The Golden Age was an era for the Sith Empire where since they were unified had the time and resources to study and advance their Dark Side knowledge, which is why even modern Sith tend to look at that era to further their techniques. Sadow and Kressh being contenders for Dark Lords of that era should speak well of their power and knowledge, heck Kressh made a gauntlet that can protect one from turbolaser strikes for his son. His own stuff should be much more potent.