Originally posted by Surtur
I'm confused, I haven't seen anyone say Gore was 100% guilty. Or even 75% guilty, or anything.But I think then the point of the topic is missed because it's actually not about whether or not Gore is guilty.
Page 1, TI is certain Gore is guilty. He yelled at me about it when I said "if true".
Originally posted by SurturThe way I see it is you can trace all the media to 4 jews and murdoch. Murdoch is controlled opposition and the one youre supposed to laugh at because he makes sensible arguments look retarded.
If there was an even number for each side I wouldn't care as much, but we both know that isn't the case.
CNN: right wing is pretty good, left wing is ALSO good, who to decide? Our experts say left wing
NBC: well, it appears that the right may be right on this but lets hear an expert who thinks differently
CBS: its clear that the left is correct on this, anything from the right?
MSNBC: The left is right. The left is right. The left is right.
FOX: OMG we are the best media dominant and we are right because we are right. Look how retarded i am because i will tell you 2+2=11
Originally posted by Robtard
As I noted before, Trump's been accused if sexual miscoduct long before he ran for Pres.Also, you have Trump in his own words bragging how he does whatever he wants with women and gets away with it cos he's rich. What other proof do you?
All that shows me is proof that Trump was behaving obnoxiously while talking during what he thought was a private conversation.
Is what he said wrong? Yes, does it mean he's an actual rapist? No.
Also he may have been accused in the past, but that doesn't change the fact that all of a sudden we have accusations coming out right now at a very convenient time. Unless you're suggesting that 100% of these accusers actually came out with this stuff years ago and the media covered it and it is just getting rehashed.
Originally posted by Surtur
All that shows me is proof that Trump was behaving obnoxiously while talking during what he thought was a private conversation.Is what he said wrong? Yes, does it mean he's an actual rapist? No.
Also he may have been accused in the past, but that doesn't change the fact that all of a sudden we have accusations coming out right now at a very convenient time. Unless you're suggesting that 100% of these accusers actually came out with this stuff years ago and the media covered it and it is just getting rehashed.
Let me guess, you also believe Cosby is innocent? He also didn't admit to it like Trump, iirc.
Originally posted by Its2016
The way I see it is you can trace all the media to 4 jews and murdoch. Murdoch is controlled opposition and the one youre supposed to laugh at because he makes sensible arguments look retarded.CNN: right wing is pretty good, left wing is ALSO good, who to decide? Our experts say left wing
NBC: well, it appears that the right may be right on this but lets hear an expert who thinks differently
CBS: its clear that the left is correct on this, anything from the right?
MSNBC: The left is right. The left is right. The left is right.
FOX: OMG we are the best media dominant and we are right because we are right. Look how retarded i am because i will tell you 2+2=11
The only fair and balanced show on MSM is Morning Joe with Mika and Joe joe scarborough and mika brzezinski. That is the only show I watch anymore.
Originally posted by Robtard
Page 1, TI is certain Gore is guilty. He yelled at me about it when I said "if true".
Perhaps we read a different page 1. I see no mention of his guilt or innocence. The "if true" thing was not a declaration of Gore's guilt, as a further post pointed out that had to do with you questioning the stories about one person and not the other. I'm not saying you actually did or didn't do that, I'm just saying I didn't see anything that spoke of Gore's guilt. Unless you count posting a description of what supposedly happened.
Originally posted by Surtur
Especially when the timing is highly suspicious, like where were all these Trump accusers a year ago?
Trump did not boast that he sexually assaults women, and then turn around and deny that he sexually assaults women, a year ago.
These women are coming forward now, because Trump has publicly denied doing the very thing he privately boasted about doing.
They may have been willing to put the indignity behind them until he denied that anything had happened to them.
Now, they want to set the record straight.
Originally posted by Surtur
All that shows me is proof that Trump was behaving obnoxiously while talking during what he thought was a private conversation.Is what he said wrong? Yes, does it mean he's an actual rapist? No.
Are we to believe he was being less honest when he did not think anyone was listening; or that he is being more honest now, when he is being criticized for what he said?
Originally posted by Adam_PoEhes being criticised for what he said. That doesnt make him a rapist. Bill Clintons face at the last debate is more suspicious.
Trump did not boast that he sexually assaults women, and then turn around and deny that he sexually assaults women, a year ago.These women are coming forward now, because Trump has publicly denied doing the very thing he privately boasted about doing.
They may have been willing to put the indignity behind them until he denied that anything had happened to them.
Now, they want to set the record straight.
Are we to believe he was being less honest when he did not think anyone was listening; or that he is being more honest now, when he is being criticized for what he said?
Originally posted by Robtard
Let me guess, you also believe Cosby is innocent? He also didn't admit to it like Trump, iirc.
The Cosby thing doesn't really have the whole "convenient timing" thing going for it.
As for his guilt or innocence, I've never been very clear on it. It says he admitted to giving them drugs. But there is a big difference between someone willingly accepting drugs from Bill Cosby and then banging him..and Bill Cosby drugging them against their will.
Though I'm curious what you would like to happen? Should Bill Cosby be put in jail? Keep in mind I am not asking if he should be put in jail if legit evidence came out, I'm asking if you think he should be put in jail based on the mere accusation of wrongdoing ?