Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
This is a proper discussion? Nah, this is trolling at its finest. The mere fact you are trying to elude that Hulkbuster cannot hurt them now is just hilarious. You lost this on your own stupidity.
Sigh. I never even said that HB can't hurt the Asgardians. I said Asgardians have never been seriously injured by any man made weapon. If you're going to keep making stuff up then there's no point in replying to you.
Bullshit
Originally posted by FrothByteSo I ask again. Name me 1 man-made weapon or material that has actually injured an Asgardian.
Originally posted by FrothByte
By saying IM can beat them by punching them. Hulkbuster suit is man-made is it not?
FYI: Tony's tech has taken on Thor, Hulk and soon Thanos.
But according to you Warriors 3 > them
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
BullshitFYI: Tony's tech has taken on Thor, Hulk and soon Thanos.
But according to you Warriors 3 > them
Yeah he took on Thor and did no damage at all to Thor.
The reason I'm bringing this up is not to say that HB can't hurt the Warriors 3 at all but rather to show you how hard it's going to be for HB to take out 1 Asgardian warrior, let alone 3.
If you read my original statement, I said HB wins 1v1 but loses 3v1. Would be stupid of me to think HB can win 1v1 but say say HB can't hurt the Warriors.
The destroyer took down all 3 with ease, HB is faster and stronger then the destroyer based on his showing against enraged hulk.
The warriors 3 have bad showings against anyone but fodder.
Not to mention HB can fly.
All they have is swords and spears. Ironmans base armor stood up to Thors hammer, Chitari Weapons, and a bunch of other crap.
This isn't even a fight, this is a literal slaughter in Ironmans favor, and this notion that Tony cant fight is complete bullshit and you know it.
He fought WS and Cap in h2h combat, as well as Thor and Enraged hulk. And he took on WS without armor.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
The destroyer took down all 3 with ease, HB is faster and stronger then the destroyer based on his showing against enraged hulk.The warriors 3 have bad showings against anyone but fodder.
Not to mention HB can fly.
All they have is swords and spears. Ironmans base armor stood up to Thors hammer, Chitari Weapons, and a bunch of other crap.
This isn't even a fight, this is a literal slaughter in Ironmans favor, and this notion that Tony cant fight is complete bullshit and you know it.
He fought WS and Cap in h2h combat, as well as Thor and Enraged hulk. And he took on WS without armor.
I'm sorry, are you saying that HB can take out Destroyer? LMAO. I'm going to make a thread right now.
Well, if you take into account the Marvel agents of shield showings, they should be pretty powerful. A smaller weaker looking one easily grabbed a military assault knife in his bare hand and bent it without being cut. Then he very easily pulled a jail cell door off. Then Lady Sif pushed an automobile several feet across pavement with one leg. To me, they should be about Spiderman level strength with even a little higher durability than him. And they should be much faster and more agile and more accurate than a regular human. But on the Thor movies, they are not shown to be quite at that level. Even at peak, the hulk buster armor should win without too much problem. The metal that thing is made of has to be stronger than conventional metal that we know of an order to take a pounding from the Haulk like it does.
Originally posted by K-Dog
Well, if you take into account the Marvel agents of shield showings, they should be pretty powerful. A smaller weaker looking one easily grabbed a military assault knife in his bare hand and bent it without being cut. Then he very easily pulled a jail cell door off. Then Lady Sif pushed an automobile several feet across pavement with one leg. To me, they should be about Spiderman level strength with even a little higher durability than him. And they should be much faster and more agile and more accurate than a regular human. But on the Thor movies, they are not shown to be quite at that level. Even at peak, the hulk buster armor should win without too much problem. The metal that thing is made of has to be stronger than conventional metal that we know of an order to take a pounding from the Haulk like it does.
What do you think would happen if Fandrall stabbed IM with his sword or if Sif stabbed him with her spear?
Originally posted by FrothByte
What do you think would happen if Fandrall stabbed IM with his sword or if Sif stabbed him with her spear?
Get lost dude, you lost this debate a week ago. Now you are trying to question your way out of the embarrassment of
"Asgardians cannot be hurt by Hulknuster cause it's made by Tony Stark."😂
Originally posted by ares834
IM rips them in half. 😐
Eh, I dunno. Loki while not truly an Asgardian, but some sort of morphed (by Odion's power) Frost Giant, yet seems comparable to Asgardians took a vicious thrashing from Hulk and lived.
Guess I'm saying the Asgardians are probably too durable to be ripped in half, unless you weren't being literal.
Originally posted by FrothByte
What do you think would happen if Fandrall stabbed IM with his sword or if Sif stabbed him with her spear?
Minor damage with nothing significant unless it was repeated hits. They could definitely damage him overtime. Loki seems to be stronger, presumably because he is an adopted son of Odin, or the frost giant Kings son. Three of him would be a good fight if each one had a blaster spear.
Originally posted by K-Dog
Minor damage with nothing significant unless it was repeated hits. They could definitely damage him overtime. Loki seems to be stronger, presumably because he is an adopted son of Odin, or the frost giant Kings son. Three of him would be a good fight if each one had a blaster spear.
What makes you think Loki is stronger? It seemed he was the least physical of them.