Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
As far as I'm aware the only temper tantrum that has occurred in an interaction between us is you when you refused to acknowledge the TFU novel in debate on the engagement between Sidious and Galen. 🙂
Refusing to acknowledge? Lol. And I'd hardly call it a temper tantrum.
Palpatine's lightning has three properties that allows him to win:
-Its speed: Grandmaster Yoda's reflexes and speed far outstrip any in this gauntlet. Yet he only managed to react to it once out of three times in the same fight. No one here is fast enough to defend against it.
-Its quantity: A weaker being than Palpatine, Plagueis, has summoned lightning storms that covered entire landscapes. Even though Palpatine himself has never done this, he is stated to have learned everything his master knew (aside from midi-chlorian manipulation) and is just overall more powerful. He can summon even larger storms that will touch every being in this gauntlet at once.
-Its intensity: Palpatine's lightning is so intense it can bend a lightsaber blade. We do not see other lightsabers do this, so the logical conclusion is that his lightning is more intense than lighstaber plasma, and too powerful to contain. Nobody here has Force defenses more potent than lightsabers, and their lightsabers are useless. Every being in this gauntlet will die upon contact.
Palpatine fires a storm, and the whole gauntlet is ash. The entire process will take barely a second. This is but one of many powers Palpatine could use to stomp this gauntlet, and not even his most lethal one. How do they stand a chance?
Originally posted by Deronn_solo
That would be unfair to you, and you know it, lal.
Because I'd lose? Maybe. But we'll never find out if you won't even try. Last time it was you who didn't respond to me.
Because I'd lose? Maybe. But we'll never find out if you won't even try.
Aight, G. What's your argument?
Last time it was you who didn't respond to me.
You made a quality post, that actually backed up what you said, what was there to reply to? I guess I could have said "fair enough" or "conceded" but, meh.