Hillary 2002 Bush Selected, Not Elected...

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"if i suspect that the votes were miscounted, i will sue for an extension and recount. if that fails, i will concede" would be his only way out of this hole he dug for himself. he'd still come off as childish to cry 'miscount' long before the count even begins, but thats better than coming off as potentially treasonous.

That is one of the reasons why the Clinton campaign is looking to expand the electoral map. The larger a margin she wins by, the less credibly he can claim the election was stolen.

Obamas own words on the $150 billion

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/05/obama-interview-iran-isis-israel/393782/

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
That is one of the reasons why the Clinton campaign is looking to expand the electoral map. The larger a margin she wins by, the less credibly he can claim the election was stolen.

Wouldn't the opposite be true? Where if Hillary landslides his orange ass and even takes states like Arizona and Texas (which would be beyond embarrassing for the Right and Trump), he could cry his "mass voter fraud" more convincingly then if Clinton wins the race by only 20 or so points.

>ignoring the vast voter fraud tapes😂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Obamas own words on the $150 billion

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/05/obama-interview-iran-isis-israel/393782/

To avoid confusion, please copy/paste the section(s) that you feel proves your point on the US "giving" Iran 150billion.

https://www.truthorfiction.com/nuclear-deal-sends-150-billion-to-iran/

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
https://www.truthorfiction.com/nuclear-deal-sends-150-billion-to-iran/

From the article you posted:

"Sanctions placed on Iran because of its nuclear program froze billions of dollars of Iran’s assets in foreign accounts. The nuclear deal would unfreeze those accounts, which the White House has estimated could send up to $150 billion to Iran.

But Obama administration officials said that Iran wouldn’t receive the full $150 billion in frozen assets because the country owes billions to China and other countries. After repaying those debts, Iran would receive about $56 billion."

Ok so the worlds leading sponsor in terrorism got 56 billion👆

That's treason to give money and aid to the enemy.

"US giving Iran" implies that US taxpayers will be out the money, it's Iran's money already.

Brokering a deal to halt the proliferation of nuclear weapons, which lessons the chance of some group that is insane enough to use them obtaining one isn't treason.

But we already did this in the Iran Deal thread long ago, so sure, let's just go with "Obama is a treasonous traitor", works for me.

He gave them $1.7 billion in tax payer money in cash.

No matter how hard you try you will never get around it.

It was treason to aid and abed the enemy.

Podesta in his emails say the deal will cause nuclear war👆

Podesta is a reliable source again? I honestly can't keep up.

And the $1.7 billion? Who's money was that?

If Trump finds himself in the unlikely position of being in Al Gore's position from 2000 then I don't think any reasonable person would hold it against him if he waited to find out the complete results and allow the automatic recount to take its course, as Gore did, before conceding.

If, however, he does end up losing by 5+ points as the polls currently suggest he will, and he refuses to concede and accept the outcome in that instance, then that's when people would rightly ridicule him.

Originally posted by BackFire
If Trump finds himself in the unlikely position of being in Al Gore's position from 2000 then I don't think any reasonable person would hold it against him if he waited to find out the complete results and allow the automatic recount to take its course, as Gore did, before conceding.

i thought that there never was a recount in 2000.

There was a recount in Florida, no?

Your electoral college system sucks balls.

He already said today he will abide by all traditions of all candidates before him

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Your electoral college system sucks balls.

It does. It's needlessly convoluted and confusing. I still haven't heard a good explanation as to why we don't just go by the popular vote.

Originally posted by BackFire
It does. It's needlessly convoluted and confusing. I still haven't heard a good explanation as to why we don't just go by the popular vote.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Because tradition? Or because can't be bothered? Or because corruption?

The explanation I hear most is so that the people that live in the states that have populations in the dozens don't feel like their vote is worthless. But I personally don't find that argument very compelling.