Originally posted by BackFire
Test screening are notoriously worthless anyways. Seems like every good movie these days tests badly. I don't take any of these reports seriously.
i agree..
Originally posted by TethAdamTheRock
Doesn't make the spoilers untrue.
well nobody actually knows until we all spend our money to find out
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
remember the good ol days, going to see a movie, knowing with 99% certainty that it'd be really good, because ebert 4-starred that shit?
Yes, I was also always impressed when he'd give a random no name movie a really good review. I remember after I saw the movie "May" and was blown away by it I looked it up and saw that Ebert had given it a glowing review too.
Also liked reading his old reviews of horror movies from the 70's. Back then he had a bit more of an open mind for more intense horror films and gave some good reviews.
Originally posted by Inhuman
YouTube video
That looks like a lot of fun. I am liking Cable so far. He might not have the height, but I like the look overall.
Also, not sure where previous comments about this film being received poorly during test screenings come from. Based on articles published on IGN and other sites, in the last few days, its test screening went better than the first film's.