GALEN MAREK (UCanShootMyNova) vs Whatever Revan you f*cking want (DarthAutist66)

You won't, lmfao.

I'll take SoR Revan.

GG. 👆

Which incarnation of Marek are you using?

Novel, game, or comic?

My Galen. 🙂 GG.

👇 Have to pick one for consistency, or else the debate would be an incarnation war.

Games and comic can be used as supplementary material where it doesn't contradict itself or the novel. Novel as primary source.

👇 Game is primary.

Nah. The game is chronologically the first source but is of less relevance for clarification because of it's many contradictions. The comic could be argued to be equal but the novel as a descriptory source is more useful in that it leaves less room for human error then the novel which relies on visual interpretation.

No, the novel is specifically derived from the game, so the game is the primary and the novel is the secondary.

Refer here for more information: http://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/gen-discussion-1/star-wars-debating-2016-1532491/

I'm not bending these accepted rules for your stupidity. Either accept the game as the primary, or there's no debate.

That header is ****ing ugly. Contact a mod to change it to something else so Ant can make a new one to ensure its divinity.

I'll be quiet after this. Agree with Syn on this one, I think the novel is much better representation and should be considered as the primary source. As for the vs itself, I side with Ant.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
That header is ****ing ugly. Contact a mod to change it to something else so Ant can make a new one to ensure its divinity.

The header is copied directly from Ant...

Originally posted by darthbane77
I'll be quiet after this. Agree with Syn on this one, I think the novel is much better representation and should be considered as the primary source. As for the vs itself, I side with Ant.

That's ironic, given that the novel itself disagrees on that.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
No, the novel is specifically derived from the game, so the game is the primary and the novel is the secondary.

Refer here for more information: http://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/gen-discussion-1/star-wars-debating-2016-1532491/

I'm not bending these accepted rules for your stupidity. Either accept the game as the primary, or there's no debate.

The game is the primary source chronologically as I just noted but it doesn't have greater authority then the other versions and because of its many contradictions and the fact it's solely a visual medium it should have the least.

Which doesn't make it not a primary source. It means the novel and the comic have many contradictions.

That's how primary, secondary, and tertiary sources work, lol.

Originally posted by Azronger
That's ironic, given that the novel itself disagrees on that.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Which doesn't make it not a primary source. It means the novel and the comic have many contradictions.

That's how primary, secondary, and tertiary sources work, lol.

And it doesn't make it a primary source either.

Between them? Sure, which is why you have to take one source above the others to clarify when there's a problem. For me that's the novel.

The sources themselves are all C canon. They don't have different levels of validity. The chronological order in which they were released doesn't matter.

Being the original source from which the others are derived from makes it the primary source by definition.

That's wrong.

My guidelines establish the primary source as the highest C-Canon.

Yes, it's the primary source chronologically. But not in regards to validity.

It's right.

Well I don't give a sh!t about your guidelines.

Look, are you going to stop making excuses and actually debate me on this or are you going to slink away?