Originally posted by Nephthys
I skipped to half way through and apparently its about Donald Duck?I.... guess that's damning?
The story is that Clinton "knew" about the people dressed as Donald Duck protesting at the Trump rallys and apparently it was even her idea.
The reason why this (kinda) matters is because the legal implications of her campaign potentially working directly with a pac, which candidates, as far as I understand, aren't supposed to do.
Frankly this isn't nearly as big as the last two videos released by this group. Like all the "damning" things people have found, there's still a large enough degree of separation between the people shown in this video and Clinton herself to where she can deny knowledge, and at that point it becomes her word vs someone else's.
Until there's words recorded coming out of her mouth, or some kind of legit paper trail, this will again essentially be a non-story for everyone outside of the right wing echo chamber.
Even then, TI. That doesn't mean as fact she ordered operation Donald Duck.
Look at it this way: If you wrote a check to some group on the premise you thought they'd peacefully and legally protest the protection of the West Nile River Rat and they ended up using your money to firebomb an embassy, you have plausible deniability that you weren't in on the crime.
Is it illegal for her to write checks to Democracy now?
The guy's mouth isn't her mouth. She can still say he was wrong or misspoke, and the guy can still say that the videos are heavily edited to the point of being misleading and challenge okeefe to release the full unedited videos, which I imagine he won't do until long after the election, if at all.
Originally posted by Robtard
Even then, TI. That doesn't mean as fact she ordered operation Donald Duck.Look at it this way: If you wrote a check to some group on the premise you thought they'd peacefully and legally protest the protection of the West Nile River Rat and they ended up using your money to firebomb an embassy, you have plausible deniability that you weren't in on the crime.
Strange you dont treat the millions of charges against trump the same way. Imagine if this was on Trumps side.
According to you Rob, emails are not proof, lying under oath is not proof, video is not proof. So what is proof to you Rob?
So once again, ANY EXPLANATION AT ALL for why this convicted felon was there hundreds of times? At all? Anything? Nope, don't say you didn't watch the video so you can't comment, I'll nip that in the butt right quick:
It is flat out said the logs of people going to the white house show this man went there many many times. This is not something just edited together, etc. This would be something easily disproved if it wasn't true, and it hasn't been disproved.
So I'm still waiting for the "why". Any reasoning at all? Even throw out a friggin guess if you have to, take a shot at guessing why. People whined when terrible people endorsed Trump, surely convicted felons that have a rotating door policy at the white house would inspire something? Not even teeny tiny bit? At all? Even like a disapproving grunt would be better than nothing.
If it wasn't true, why have people been fired and resigned😂
Also this is Robert Creamers Wife..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Schakowsky
U.S. Representative for Illinois's 9th congressional district, serving since 1999. She is a member of the Democratic Party.
No one wanted to watch the video, cause they are afraid to learn the truth about the Clintons.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
If it wasn't true, why have people been fired and resigned😂Also this is Robert Creamers Wife..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Schakowsky
U.S. Representative for Illinois's 9th congressional district, serving since 1999. She is a member of the Democratic Party.
Sorry, the DNC has a strict no tolerance policy on people making up lies about employee's. You either must resign or you are fired.
This is why "The Onion" has probably gotten more people in the DNC fired than any other website.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Yea if that was the case, they why has Hillary not resigned?Double standard?
Of course, she's a female and a liberal to boot. They love double standards. We saw Morning Joe freak the f*ck out on people who forget this.
The best part is when he asks them all if they have recently hit their heads.
The facial expressions of the one woman are also priceless. I don't know why it shows Bill Mahers face on the clip though, he's not involved in it.
watch him rip his panel here.
It was also hilarious how the other people tried to recover this fumble with "err but we're not talking about that!" and he's like "well I am talking about that".
Or the part where he says the woman was asking him how kids will be effected growing up with a president who doesn't respect women, and he points out "as well as they did when Bill Clinton was president" and once again "er no that isn't what we meant".
They continually try to stop him from pointing out the hypocrisy.
They try to but he powers through, so does she.
Watch this, she Rips, Obama, Hillary, the media on the email scandal.
I also want to say this nonsense is overblown too. I have no doubts if Trump loses he will say the system is rigged(though it seems to at least partially be something that is true), but they are acting like he is going to call upon people to march upon Washington D.C. with shotguns and pitchforks.
You know what will happen? I'm sure he'll go on Twitter and say some shit. Maybe a lot of shit. But okay..and the world will still turn.