It can't be real, is what I immediately thought. I looked in the comments section of youtube and saw someone posting a link from Snopes showing it wasn't true, and I was like "yeah, ha, thought so".
Then I had a sort of revelation..Snopes has been used a lot to debunk things(especially lately with politics) so, I wonder how credible they are? Did some searching, and found stuff like this:
and this:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2016/07/31/bye-bye-snopes-youre-dead-to-me-now/
As a few of many articles about the site. So..yeah, I have learned that when it comes to non-political things I will trust them ,otherwise? Not so much.
Originally posted by Surtur
It can't be real, is what I immediately thought. I looked in the comments section of youtube and saw someone posting a link from Snopes showing it wasn't true, and I was like "yeah, ha, thought so".Then I had a sort of revelation..Snopes has been used a lot to debunk things(especially lately with politics) so, I wonder how credible they are? Did some searching, and found stuff like this:
and this:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2016/07/31/bye-bye-snopes-youre-dead-to-me-now/
As a few of many articles about the site. So..yeah, I have learned that when it comes to non-political things I will trust them ,otherwise? Not so much.
Wow that second website is badass. Snopes has no credibility now.
Re: Democrat voter Fraud/Rigging 2016
Originally posted by Time-Immemorialokay i watched it. Does this mean trump really does have a time machine? I was told the results of fraud will be found out on December 21st. I wonder if this will happen.
YouTube video
Trump will be the first president who actually lost the electoral college on election day and he will make 911 a national holiday.
He will also resign so Pence becomes president.
Originally posted by Surtur
and this:https://ethicsalarms.com/2016/07/31/bye-bye-snopes-youre-dead-to-me-now/
As a few of many articles about the site. So..yeah, I have learned that when it comes to non-political things I will trust them ,otherwise? Not so much.
I do have to say, the author in that article did a good job of laying out the argument and facts and making a great case. I especially enjoyed that the author pointed out that Clinton did a damn good and honorable job being a defender to he best of her abilities. When you are assigned cases to defend, your job is to do a good job. It is not to help criminals. It is to give them the best chance at a fair trial in the US Courts. She was upholding the law and fulfilling a person's constitutional rights. You can't pick and choose when you choose to uphold someone's constitutional rights.
But she shouldn't be laughing when discussing gruesome cases like that...it's called having decorum.
Okay a few things. 1. It was a private conversation and she tried her best to make the case for him actually convincing because the defendant were ready to drop charges and accept that cut underwear was sufficient in letting him get off. She actually was laughing at the idea that she was being set up to accept such a horrid case. Now, is it possible she was lying? Yes. But this case doesnt really sit well for me for a number of reasons. Why the ****ing hell were they presenting cut underwear as evidence of blood not in his pants? There are so many questions to be answered. Yes shes a piece of shit lawyer, but i actually think she tried to help the little girl and just did a shitty job of doing such. And who cares, shes rich and famous. This has to be the weirdest thing ive ever heard in politics tho.
Also, smartmatic pulled out from rigging the election because Trump brought it up. I think people are intellectual enough to see corruption and are tired of the same. Now theyre using paper voter fraud instead? Well, at least the smartmatic machines werent used.
Honestly though, DNC must be shitting themselves.
How mad would Trump fans be if the map actually looked like this?