Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
His position is cause trump said months ago could there be a chance Weiner had access to the computer, means he was tipped off by the FBI who just found out a few weeks ago.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
No you said Trump knew about it and was Tipped off by the FBI.
Another strawman. Silly, TI.
Originally posted by Robtard
Sure:The FBI releasing this info in the manner they did a week before the election when they've had this info for weeks smells of this being a hit-piece to damage Clinton's chances in the election. It's politically motived.
I also suspect that the FBI in the coming weeks to maybe months will clear Clinton once again, but the damage has already been done.
Do you think the people had a right to know this stuff?
Originally posted by Robtard
Sure:The FBI releasing this info in the manner they did a week before the election when they've had this info for weeks smells of this being a hit-piece to damage Clinton's chances in the election. It's politically motived.
I also suspect that the FBI in the coming weeks to maybe months will clear Clinton once again, but the damage has already been done.
That seems like a tin-foil hat conspiracy of yours, sir. Something I don't see you do very often.
Since Hillary's "team" got a pivate meeting with the DOJ "on the tarmac", I think it is more likely that Hillary is behind these supposed "leaks." Meaning, it is used as a spin machine to make it look like Trump is going after her in a pathetic last minute bid.
Keep in mind, I don't believe this. I'm just saying it looks more likely to be that than your idea. Both are tinfoil hatty, to be sure.
Edit - Thanks for the summary. I'm caught up and have said what I think. More specifically, the FBI isn't taking Trump's side.
Originally posted by Surtur
Do you think the people had a right to know this stuff?
If there's something criminal in regards to Clinton, of course we need to know, I want to know more than any Trumpanzee. But you release it in a concise manner after they've made your case. Not vagueness where anyone can draw crazy conclusions that may or may not be true a week before the election.
ie it's a hit-piece