Dickileaks

Incorrect as usual. You have no proof of anything.

Provide actual proof or concede to its your own conspiracy theory.

Since when did conspiracy after conspiracy against Clinton need proof? Kettle, pot, and that.

But I feel my proof while not concrete, is overall plausible. Trump knew about this 14months ago, the FBI knew about it weeks ago, they release a vague statement a week before election.

IMO, Trump's trying to win the election via backhanded tactics and Comey is assisting him, either willingly or he's being used and doesn't know it.

So trump knew before the FBI. Who told him?

IMO you loved Comey in July for his honesty, now you think he is dishonest😂

How convienent

Again Provide proof trump used his wealth and power on the FBI.

If you're going to keep asking me the same questions I've already answered 2-3 times now because the page flipped, I'd just rather not.

I did? Care to show what you're insinuating?

Provide proof he used his wealth and power on the FBI after she was already cleared by Comey and the FBI just found out and Uma now says she didn't even know.

Again, I've already explained my position multiple times. Asking me what I've answered is not a game I'm going to partake in. I've answered that already; more than once.

You have not given proof, you came up with a conspiracy.

So good we can stop, you provided no proof other then a baseless claim that cause he made a guess Weiner might of have access to the info, and he paid people off who didn't know it existed.

While I'll freely admit that my proof isn't unquestionable, because that's being honest, it also isn't unreasonable.

ie How in the eff did Trump know about Weiner's email 14 months before the FBI and why aren't the Trump people the ones most curious about this.

Ok

"Bill Clinton had 5% chance he had access to Hillarys emails"

If a person said that Does that make them clairvoyant or guilty of using wealth and power?

Why are you acting like an assumption is now a conspiracy?

Listen, you fully buy the "Trump made a lucky guess" narrative. I don't buy that whatsoever. The events how they happened tell me there was foolery at play.

Provide evidence he knew about someone neither Huma or Comey knew about.

Did all the people who knew Brexit would happen, have some inside scoop?

Literally already covered that several times: He spoke about it 14months ago

IIRC, more people thought Brexit wouldn't happen than would, even Brexit's most staunch political supporters. it's why after it happened they didn't have a plan and were caught with there trousers down and their dick's stuck in the pig

So the polls said stay, the people who thought they were going to leave were paid off?

Britain seems fine to me. No apocolpyse👆

Were the people that predicted the and shorted the 2008 financial crisis paid off top?

Originally posted by Robtard
Literally already covered that several times: He spoke about it 14months ago

IIRC, more people thought Brexit wouldn't happen than would, even Brexit's most staunch political supporters. it's why after it happened they didn't have a plan and were caught with there trousers down and their dick's stuck in the pig

Btw, Cameron was the pig ****er and he campaigned to stay in Europe.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So the polls said stay, the people who thought they were going to leave were paid off?

Britain seems fine to me. No apocolpyse👆

No, they made a lucky guess off of a 'Yes or No' outcome, they literally had 50% chance in wild guessing, the people who weren't in the know. That's far different than Trump's Weiner "guess".

The value of their currency is down like 35% and expected to drop to one of the lowest points by end of next year. I wouldn't say losing 30-40% of your wealth's value as being "fine", maybe it's just me.

Originally posted by Andytalks
You are so ignorant. I assume you're talking about honest likeable Boris, right? Because he was never a UKIP politician.

Btw, Cameron was the pig ****er and he campaigned to stay in Europe.

Welcome back XYZ. Still triggered I see.

Originally posted by Robtard
Since when did conspiracy after conspiracy against Clinton need proof? Kettle, pot, and that.

But I feel my proof while not concrete, is overall plausible. Trump knew about this 14months ago, the FBI knew about it weeks ago, they release a vague statement a week before election.

IMO, Trump's trying to win the election via backhanded tactics and Comey is assisting him, either willingly or he's being used and doesn't know it.

So your concern is less with the content of the complaint, and more with the timing of stirring things up?

Hello, sexual harrassment? 😉

Originally posted by Robtard
No, they made a lucky guess off of a 'Yes or No' outcome, they literally had 50% chance in wild guessing, the people who weren't in the know. That's far different than Trump's Weiner "guess".

The value of their currency is down like 35% and expected to drop to one of the lowest points by end of next year. I wouldn't say losing 30-40% of your wealth's value as being "fine", maybe it's just me.

Wow so that's a massive logic leap.

You still have not explained how trump knew about something the FBI didn't even know about.

Now explain how it's such s big deal he said "weiner could have had access"

That's like saying "it's a leap to guess foreign actors gained access to HRC server."

Originally posted by cdtm
So your concern is less with the content of the complaint, and more with the timing of stirring things up?

Hello, sexual harrassment? 😉

Incorrect. I've already stated that if there is something actually illegal, I'd be the first to want to see it and have it exposed.

Huh? Came off as creepy, dude.