Dickileaks

Originally posted by Surtur
Thanks for showing us all how smart you are by implying Trump will start a nuclear war.

YouTube video

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Not proof👆

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Was posted, you wanting to ignore it doesn't change that.

Originally posted by Surtur
Thanks for showing us all how smart you are by implying Trump will start a nuclear war.

#PoorReadingComprehension

Originally posted by Robtard
-Trump being Trump and talking about Wiener's email back in August of last year, he somehow knew before the FBI

-The FBI sitting on this for weeks and releasing it a week before the election

-The method the FBI released it where it could be taken in negative views

/obvious-hit-piece-is-obvious. But alas, who cares about the truth, as long as Trump wins

edit: If you're going to quote me multiple times before and after I reply, it's going to get really messy and garbled in here. Or is that your intention?

Not proof👆

An educated guess of 5% was his statement that he would have access since married to one of these irresponsible and reckless people

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Originally posted by Surtur
This isn't a serious question, right? Just the fact people who worked for her were talking about starting riots and shit at rallies show me her victory wouldn't be squeaky clean.

So no actual proof, just accusations that never fully panned out.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
#PoorReadingComprehension

#dominatedbywomen

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Pretty ignorant statement.

Not really, if you're old enough to remember the cold war.

Originally posted by Robtard
So no actual proof, just accusations that never fully panned out.

So no actual proof on your baseless accusations?

Originally posted by Robtard
So no actual proof, just accusations that never fully panned out.

No actual, proof, the only proof we have is that this same man visited the White House 340 times, etc. and is a convicted felon on top of that.

But yeah , now people are suddenly worried about corruption?

Originally posted by Negan
Not really, if you're old enough to remember the cold war.

Hillary will get us into a war with Russia, we both know this.

Most of us were shitting bricks with Raygun in Office and he was only senile.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Not proof👆

An educated guess of 5% was his statement that he would have access since married to one of these irresponsible and reckless people

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Again, if you're going to quote and reply multiple times to a post I made, even after I've replied it's going to get garbled in here, but I think that's your intention, anything to draw away from the topic that this is a hit-piece against Clinton and that if Trump wins now (I still doubt it, but who knows) it will be through treachery.

Originally posted by Surtur
No actual, proof, the only proof we have is that this same man visited the White House 340 times, etc. and is a convicted felon on top of that.

But yeah , now people are suddenly worried about corruption?

Rob does not believe the official whitehouse visitor log, nor the videos, nor anything involving the corruption of the clintons or the democratic party.

Originally posted by Robtard
Again, if you're going to quote and reply multiple times to a post I made, even after I've replied it's going to get garbled in here, but I think that's your intention, anything to draw away from the topic that this is a hit-piece against Clinton and that if Trump wins now (I still doubt it, but who knows) it will be through treachery.

Not proof 👆

An educated guess of 5% was his statement that he would have access since married to one of these irresponsible and reckless people

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Of course Hillary is corrupt and not fit for Office, that doesn't make her the wrong choice in this Election.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Not proof 👆

An educated guess of 5% was his statement that he would have access since married to one of these irresponsible and reckless people

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

[b]What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said. [/B]

"Do you think its even 5% chance weiner could have had access" DJT.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/28/flashback_august_2015_donald_trump_talks_about_anthony_weiner_accessing_classified_info_through_huma_abedin.html

I just proved you wrong, now retract your bogus statement.

You didn't offer proof, and I proved your speculation wrong.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
#dominatedbywomen

oh no, another attack on my character from someone with zero credibility. i better divert from the topic of your hypocrisy to address this. or not. 🙂

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
"Do you think its even 5% chance weiner could have had access" DJT.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/28/flashback_august_2015_donald_trump_talks_about_anthony_weiner_accessing_classified_info_through_huma_abedin.html

I just proved you wrong, now retract your bogus statement.

You didn't offer proof, and I proved your speculation wrong.

Originally posted by Negan
Of course Hillary is corrupt and not fit for Office, that doesn't make her the wrong choice in this Election.

SO you want to go to war with Russia? Are you dumb or just ignorant to the truth?