Originally posted by Time-ImmemorialI said that using Hillary's short comings in character to push Trump is silly considering his own faults.
I never told you who to vote for, your entry into this thread was dumb. You said cause we aren't bashing trump it's silliness.Are you like unable to comprehend?
Which is what I think is trying to happen in this thread. If it isn't fine but Hillary is still the more qualified candidate of the two.
No she isn't, she's a career criminal who has displaced 10,000,000 people, lined her pockets with corporate money, Who sold out the US, gave 20% of our Uranium to Russia for $145,000,000 into her own pocket, gave China missle tech to China, Who has zero successes as a senator and SOS.
For the third time: Go ahead and name her policy positions and explain how they are better for America then Trumps.
Originally posted by Time-ImmemorialSure.
No she isn't👆
The guy that has asked about using Nukes.
The guy that wants to take away a woman's right to choose.
The guy that has proposed religion tests as a viable option.
Killing family members of suspected terrorists.
Willing to send US Citizens to Gitmo forgoing their national rights.
Building an expensive and useless wall.
Lowering taxes while increasing military spending/operations.
The guy that said the Chinese faked global warming to destroy America.
The guy that essentially wants to take us back to before Obamacare. Yes Obamacare needs to be reworked but the previous system allowed companies to uninsure too many people.
Somehow that guy is more qualified then a someone who actually has on foreign trades with countries. Someone who has served as a US Senator.
Hillary wants to cease tax loopholes for the rich. She wants to at least keep universal health care as an option. She wants to raise the minimum wage. Wants to address rising health care costs. She wants to keep a woman's right to choose. She at least has an immigration plan that is feasible even if it isn't what most conservatives would want. At the very least she has said these are things she is planing on working on.
Trump is basically going to be Bush Jr 2 but with even worse understandings of how things work. And Bush led us into one of the worst recessions we've had.
So I would rather have Hillary even as two faced as she is over Trump who is essentially a con artist making terrible promises with terrible ideas.
Originally posted by Newjak
The guy that said the Chinese faked global warming to destroy America.
Honestly this alone is enough to disqualify him for me. That someone could hold such an abhorrently idiotic stance towards climate change and clearly holding science in such a low regard is very disturbing.
This has been a very strange election for me. I was not proud to vote for Hillary Clinton, but I was very proud to vote against Donald Trump.
Frankly anything other than "Climate change is a seriously problem and we need to take it seriously and make sure we address it as soon as possible" is disqualifying to me. Even if he doesn't think that it's a Chinese hoax, he doesn't take it seriously, and that's enough for me to never ever vote for him. That is unless someone gives me a donut.
No he was called racist quite a bit for his birther crap.
Originally posted by BackFireYeah same thing here with the election.
Honestly this alone is enough to disqualify him for me. That someone could hold such an abhorrently idiotic stance towards climate change and clearly holding science in such a low regard is very disturbing.This has been a very strange election for me. I was not proud to vote for Hillary Clinton, but I was very proud to vote against Donald Trump.
Originally posted by BackFire
Frankly anything other than "Climate change is a seriously problem and we need to take it seriously and make sure we address it as soon as possible" is disqualifying to me. Even if he doesn't think that it's a Chinese hoax, he doesn't take it seriously, and that's enough for me to never ever vote for him. That is unless someone gives me a donut.No he was called racist quite a bit for his birther crap.
Why is it racist to question if he was born in America? When liberals questioned if John McCain was born in America, that wasn't racist..
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why is it racist to question if he was born in America? When liberals questioned if John McCain was born in America, that wasn't racist..
Whether it's actually racist or not is irrelevant here, you said no one called him racist before he ran for president - they did.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Ok but it's not actually racist. Trump questioned Cruz birthplace, no one called him racist.The term racist is only reserved to if you question Barack Obama.
Difference is that in both Cruz's and McCain's case, both were merely referencing where they were actually born. Cruz was factually born in Calgary. And McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, outside of America. The question was about the technical legality of either of them running for president. Where as with Obama, despite being born in Hawaii, conspiracy theorists/dumb people insisted he was born in Africa despite evidence to the contrary in a racist attempt to make him seem foreign/weird. So yes, I do believe Obama's birther accusations are based on race, I don't believe they would have occurred if he was white.