Inquisitor = Ventress interview

Any of the Inqs being on the same level as Ventress is goddamn retarded.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Nope, I'm just aware of what he actually said, and the contexts in which he said it. 🙂

The context you think he said it in, there's a difference.

Nope the contexts were very clear.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Nope, I'm just aware of what he actually said, and the contexts in which he said it. 🙂

Well contexts can be argued both ways.

DD is arguing a different context of his Ahsoka statement to you. So neither of you are using double standards. You're just disagreeing on his meaning.

I on the other hand just think he's biased as f*** when it comes to Ahsoka.

Nah, he said Filoni's words aren't Canon so they don't matter. 🙂

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Nah, he said Filoni's words aren't Canon so they don't matter. 🙂

Well that's an interesting debate tbh. Is all of his commentary and interviews on Rebels canon? If so, then is Abrams commentary and interviews on TFA also canon, and Lucas's commentary and interviews on the OT and PT also still canon?

And do these commentaries supersede feats, showings, the story group statements, source books e.t.c. Or do those things supersede the commentaries, or are they all on par with each other?

There are not Canon, but that doesn't mean they don't matter.

I said that they theoretically shouldn't matter anyway not to mention that there is obviously a difference if his opinion is contradicted by feats or his opinion is merely an addition to a certain fact (e.g. How the Inquisitor's rotating lightsaber is a 'cheat mode'😉.

Or in other words when they don't align with your perspective. 🙂

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Sure but it confirms his solid superiority over her

What are you talking about?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I think both Maul and Kenobi proved they were solidly above Ventress in "Revival" when they both stomped Opress. Ventress never proved herself capable of even winning against Opress.

That's due to the various disadvantages she had going against her in that fight and a lack of time to adjust to using a single blade after using dual blades in combat for nearly the entirety of the Clone Wars.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
What are you talking about?

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
No, but he's close apparently.

Nah he said that the greatest Inquisitor is approaching her level but still not really close.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
That's due to the various disadvantages she had going against her in that fight and a lack of time to adjust to using a single blade after using dual blades in combat for nearly the entirety of the Clone Wars.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Maul >> Ventress >/= GI.

Not at all and I would have a debate on that subject with you. Ventress vs Maul lightsabers only. Any version you want.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Source?

TCW and the RotS Novel.

Quotes please. Ventress isn't even in the RotS novel lmao.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Not at all and I would have a debate on that subject with you. Ventress vs Maul lightsabers only. Any version you want.

No but confirmation that Makashi is weak to a great output of kinetic energy is.

Along with Dooku himself being thrown across the room by a blow from Opress and Ventress never having demonstrated using a single saber in combat and the fact that she was deprived of said saber and was given no time for adjustment before entering combat.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
I am just saying, what he thinks about this.
Obviously, Ventress >>> GI, lol.

Sorry. Wasn't sure what you were saying.